HIV ile Enfekte Erkeklerde Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma spp. ve Mycoplasma spp. Varlığının Aranmasında İmmünokromatografik (IK) ve Gerçek Zamanlı Polimeraz Zincir Reaksiyonu (Rt-PCR) Testlerinin Kıyaslanması
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Laboratory testing is critical for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) as most of the infected people usually have no symptoms. It is known that having HIV and STI coinfection increases the risk of HIV transmission. Sensitive tests are required for the infection control. The aim of this study was to compare the 2 different diagnostic tests-an immunochromatographic (IC) test and a real-time polymerase chain reaction (Rt-PCR) assay-for screening Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma spp. in HIV-infected men. The tests were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, rapidity, sample types and cost per test. Eighty HIV-infected adult men who were admitted to Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Hospital STIs Outpatient Clinic between October 2017-April 2018 were included in the study. Urine and urethral swab samples were collected from each patient. Urine samples were tested by BDMAX (Becton-Dickinson, Canada) assay, Chlamydia antigen cassette test (Monlab, Spain) and Mycoview test (Zeakon, France). Urethral swabs were tested by Gonorrhoeae cassette test (Monlab, Spain). In 18 (22.5%) of the 80 HIV-infected individuals, the presence of at least one of the four agents was detected by Rt-PCR method. A total of 23 agents were reported as one N.gonorrhoeae (1/80), two C.trachomatis (2/80), seven Mycoplasma spp. (7/80), 13 Ureaplasma spp. (13/80). In five (27.7%) patients, Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma spp. were detected simultaneously. Twelve of 23 bacteria detected by Rt-PCR were also detected by IC tests; however, the remaining 11 bacteria (one N.gonorrhoeae, two C.trachomatis, four Ureaplasma spp., four Mycoplasma spp.) were not detected. When IC tests were compared to the gold standard test Rt-PCR, the sensitivity was 47.8% (11/23) and the positive-predictive value was 100% (11/11). Sixteen patients had STI-related signs and symptoms whereas 64 were asymptomatic. Only two of the 18 men with positive-Rt-PCR test results had STI-related symptoms. It was concluded that all individuals with risky behaviours should undergo STIs screening regardless of their symptoms. As obtaining urethral samples could create difficulty for the patients as well as for the physicians, using urine samples determined to be more convenient. In our study the sensitivity of IC tests found to be insufficiently low. It was concluded that in STI screening the use of Rt-PCR method, which has high sensitivity, specificity and ability to give results on the same day although a high cost test could be preferred on high risk groups such as HIV-infected individuals with no signs of infection.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».