Development of a Prototype Questionnaire to Survey Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering: Reliability of the Second Prototype
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessContemporary Issues in Communication Science and DisordersArticle1 Oct 2009Development of a Prototype Questionnaire to Survey Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering: Reliability of the Second Prototype Kenneth O. St. Louis, , Bobbie B. Lubker, , J. Scott Yaruss, , and Elizabeth F. Aliveto Kenneth O. St. Louis Google Scholar , , Bobbie B. Lubker Google Scholar , , J. Scott Yaruss Google Scholar , , and Elizabeth F. Aliveto Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_36_F_101 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Communication Sciences & Disorders26:4 (909-920)31 Dec 2022Reliability and Validity of the Attitudes toward Your Child's SpeechDahye Choi, Hyun Sub Sim, Soo Bok Lee and Han Joe Kim Journal of Fluency Disorders67 (105828)1 Mar 2021Changing Polish university students' attitudes toward clutteringKatarzyna Węsierska, Kenneth O. St. Louis, Marta Wesierska and Izabela Porwoł OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi17:34 (831-854)28 Feb 2021Türk Bireylerin Kekemeliği Olan Bireylere Yönelik Dinleyici Tepkileri: Kültürlerarası Bir KarşılaştırmaMehmet Emrah CANGİ and Cansu ALPAY PLOS ONE16:2 (e0245673)4 Feb 2021Public attitudes towards people who stutter in South EgyptAhmed Arafa, Shaimaa Senosy, Haytham A. Sheerah, Kenneth St. Louis and Perla Werner American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology29:4 (2023-2038)12 Nov 2020Comparing and Predicting Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering, Obesity, and Mental IllnessKenneth O. St. LouisPerspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups4:6 (1337-1343)26 Dec 2019Oral Face-to-Face Versus Online Administration of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering/ChildKenneth O. St. Louis, Lauren E. Myers, Madison Flick Barnes, Meredith A. Saunders, Becca M. Hall and Mary E. Weidner Journal of Communication Disorders (105972)1 Dec 2019SUCCESS IN CHANGING STUTTERING ATTITUDES: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 29 INTERVENTION STUDIESKenneth O. St. Louis, Katarzyna Węsierska, Aneta Przepiórka, Agata Błachnio, Chelsea Beucher, Fauzia Abdalla, Timothy Flynn, Isabella Reichel, Ann Beste-Guldborg, Lejla Junuzović-Žunić, Sheryl Gottwald, Jessica Hartley, Sarah Eisert, Kia N. Johnson, Benjamin Bolton, Mohyeddin Teimouri Sangani, Hossein Rezai, Salman Abdi, M. Pushpavathi, Daniel Hudock, Sara Spears and Elizabeth Aliveto Journal of Fluency Disorders59 (64-79)1 Mar 2019Comparing stuttering attitudes of preschool through 5th grade children and their parents in a predominately rural Appalachian sampleHaley L. Glover, Kenneth O. St. Louis and Mary E. Weidner American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology27:3S (1195-1210)19 Oct 2018Improving Polish Stuttering Attitudes: An Experimental Study of Teachers and University StudentsKenneth O. St. Louis, Katarzyna Węsierska and Irena PolewczykAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology27:2 (721-736)3 May 2018Maintenance of Improved Attitudes Toward StutteringKenneth O. St. Louis and Timothy W. Flynn Journal of Fluency Disorders52 (37-52)1 Jun 2017A country-wide probability sample of public attitudes toward stuttering in PortugalAna Rita S. Valente, Kenneth O. St. Louis, Margaret Leahy, Andreia Hall and Luis M.T. Jesus Journal of Fluency Disorders50 (1-12)1 Dec 2016Reactions of protective service workers towards people who stutterJian Li, Hayley S. Arnold and Ann Beste-Guldborg Journal of Communication Disorders62 (115-130)1 Jul 2016Public attitudes toward stuttering in Europe: Within-country and between-country comparisonsKenneth O. St. Louis, Hilda Sønsterud, Lejla Junuzović-Žunić, Donatella Tomaiuoli, Francesca Del Gado, Emilia Caparelli, Mareen Theiling, Cecilie Flobakk, Lise Nesbakken Helmen, Ragnhild R. Heitmann, Helene Kvenseth, Sofia Nilsson, Tobias Wetterling, Cecilia Lundström, Ciara Daly, Margaret Leahy, Laila Tyrrell, David Ward and Marta Węsierska Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups1:4 (44-53)31 Mar 2016Attitudes of College Career Counselors Towards Stuttering and People Who StutterRonda Walker, Robert Mayo and Kenneth O. St. Louis Journal of Fluency Disorders47 (27-37)1 Mar 2016Associations between beliefs about and reactions toward people who stutterHayley S. Arnold and Jian Li Journal of Fluency Disorders47 (38-55)1 Mar 2016Speech pathology student clinician attitudes and beliefs towards people who stutter: A mixed-method pilot studyEllen Koutsodimitropoulos, Melissa Buultjens, Kenneth O. St. Louis and Melissa Monfries South African Journal of Communication Disorders63:116 Feb 2016Primary school teachers' opinions and attitudes towards stuttering in two South African urban education districtsKristen Abrahams, Michal Harty, Kenneth O. St. Louis, Lehana Thabane and Harsha Kathard Ella Y. N. Siu and Noi Keng Koh (2016) A Design-Based Intervention Approach to the Development of a Financial Literacy Interactive Learning Journey for Youths in Singapore International Handbook of Financial Literacy10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_36 Journal of Communication Disorders56 (8-18)1 Jul 2015Reactions of teachers versus non-teachers toward people who stutterJian Li and Hayley S. Arnold Journal of Fluency Disorders44 (74-87)1 Jun 2015Attitudes toward stuttering of nonstuttering preschool and kindergarten children: A comparison using a standard instrument prototypeMary E. Weidner, Kenneth O. St. Louis, Megan E. Burgess and Staci N. LeMasters Journal of Fluency Disorders43 (28-39)1 Mar 2015Beliefs of teachers versus non-teachers about people who stutterHayley S. Arnold, Jian Li and Kathryn Goltl Journal of Fluency Disorders42 (21-34)1 Dec 2014Public attitudes toward—and identification of—cluttering and stuttering in Norway and Puerto RicoKenneth O. St. Louis, Hilda Sønsterud, Edna J. Carlo, Ragnhild R. Heitmann and Helene Kvenseth Journal of Communication Disorders50 (36-50)1 Jul 2014The Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S) and Bipolar Adjective Scale (BAS): Aspects of validityKenneth O. St. Louis, Mandy J. Williams, Mercedes B. Ware, Jacqueline Guendouzi and Isabella K. Reichel Journal of Fluency Disorders39 (34-50)1 Mar 2014Stuttering attitudes of students: Professional, intracultural, and international comparisonsKenneth O. St. Louis, Aneta M. Przepiorka, Ann Beste-Guldborg, Mandy J. Williams, Agata Blachnio, Jacqueline Guendouzi, Isabella K. Reichel and Mercedes B. Ware Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools45:1 (14-25)1 Jan 2014Modifying Attitudes of Arab School Teachers Toward StutteringFauzia Abdalla and Kenneth O. St. Louis International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology14:6 (543-556)1 Dec 2012Stuttering attitudes in Hong Kong and adjacent Mainland ChinaMan Ling Ip, Kenneth O. St. Louis, Florence L. Myers and Steve An Xue Journal of Communication Disorders45:3 (246-253)1 May 2012Male versus female attitudes toward stutteringKenneth O. St. Louis Journal of Fluency Disorders37:1 (54-69)1 Mar 2012Arab school teachers' knowledge, beliefs and reactions regarding stutteringFauzia A. Abdalla and Kenneth O. St. Louis Journal of Communication Disorders45:2 (129-146)1 Mar 2012Research and development on a public attitude instrument for stutteringKenneth O. St. Louis Journal of Fluency Disorders36:4 (318-333)1 Dec 2011Stuttering attitudes among Turkish family generations and neighbors from representative samplesR. Sertan Özdemir, Kenneth O. St. Louis and Seyhun Topbaş Journal of Fluency Disorders36:4 (256-261)1 Dec 2011The Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S): Summary framework and empirical comparisonsKenneth O. St. Louis Journal of Fluency Disorders36:4 (262-267)1 Dec 2011Public attitudes toward stuttering in Turkey: Probability versus convenience samplingR. Sertan Özdemir, Kenneth O. St. Louis and Seyhun Topbaş Journal of Fluency Disorders36:2 (110-121)1 Jun 2011Changing adolescent attitudes toward stutteringTimothy W. Flynn and Kenneth O. St. Louis Journal of Communication Disorders43:5 (361-377)1 Sep 2010Measuring attitudes toward stuttering: English-to-French translations in Canada and CameroonKenneth O. St. Louis and Patricia M. Roberts Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups (1-8)Addressing Attitudes About Stuttering in Preservice TeachersAnne Zappi Williams, John Tetnowski and Kenneth O. St. Louis Volume 36Issue FallOctober 2009Pages: 101-107 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Oct 1, 2009 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2009 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».