MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2964408558 · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2019.13698symposium

Fostering Sustainable Careers: Conceptual and Empirical Research on Different Categories of Workers

2019· article· en· W2964408558 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jos Akkermans, Ans De Vos, Béatrice van der Heijden, Julia Richardson

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConceptualizationSustainabilityEmpirical researchSociologyConceptual frameworkPublic relationsField (mathematics)Engineering ethicsManagementSocial sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringEconomicsEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This symposium aims to bring forward scientific knowledge about fostering sustainable careers, thereby incorporating both conceptual and empirical contributions on different categories of workers. As such, it builds on last year’s symposium at AOM 2018, which focused on conceptual research related to career sustainability. Technological, societal, and labor market developments – such as digitalization, the rapidly changing and unpredictable economic environment in which careers evolve (Lawrence, Hall, & Arthur, 2015), and an increasing retirement age – have caused scholars to focus on studying the sustainability of careers across the life-span (see for example De Vos, Van der Heijden, & Akkermans, 2018). Although the conceptualization of a sustainable career has received increasing momentum in scientific journals (e.g., De Vos & Van der Heijden, 2017; De Vos et al., 2018; McDonald & Hite, 2018) and also at previous, major academic conferences, the scholarly topic of sustainable careers is still in its infancy, and, as a result, there is still a serious lack of scholarly work – especially on different categories of workers – in this field. Therefore, in this symposium, we will present five research papers that all contribute to this aim, by taking a multiple-stakeholder perspective, and focusing on how career sustainability can be fostered among different types of workers. Papers 1 and 3 comprise, respectively, a conceptual and an empirical contribution into the important role of leadership in the light of fostering sustainable careers. Paper 2 offers empirical work on how professional jobs can be redesigned, by collaborative crafting roles of employees and their employers, in order to effectively reduce workloads. Papers 4 and 5 offer conceptual work on career sustainability of temporary workers (paper 4) and project and dual earner workers (paper 5). More specifically, paper 4 reflects on the interplay between different types of flexible contracts, psychological contract formation, and career sustainability. In Paper 5, a multiple-stakeholder perspective (i.e., employee, private life context, supervisor, organization, and broader labor market) on sustainable careers of project-based and dual earner workers is reflected in several propositions. There will be an explicit attention for integrating the conceptual and empirical insights from the five papers and linking them with sound practical recommendations, thereby drawing implications for both future scholarly work in this field and for practice. This will be done through an active discussion with presenters and participants, wherein attendees are engaged to distill both scientific and practical knowledge on fostering sustainable careers of different categories of workers. Together, this should lead to moving the research field of sustainable careers forward, and to provide guidance for future researchers and practitioners with interests across a variety of disciplines, such as careers, HR, OB, and aging across the life-span. Keywords: Sustainable Careers, Leadership, Job Redesign, Career Management, Flexible Work, Psychological Contract, Multiple-Stakeholder Perspective, Project Work, Different Categories of Workers Participant Agreements: We have received statements from all intended participants agreeing to participate in the entire symposium, AND stating that they are not in violation of the “Rule of Three + Three”. Purposeful Sustaining: The Role of Purpose and Relational Leadership in the Sustainable Career Presenter: Jon P. Briscoe; Northern Illinois U. Presenter: Brittany Buis; U. of Illinois at Chicago Desperately Seeking Sustainable Careers: Redesigning Professional Jobs for the Collaborative Crafting of Reduced-Load Work Presenter: Ellen Ernst Kossek; Purdue U. Presenter: Ariane Ollier-Malaterre; UQAM U. of Quebec in Montreal, Canada The Role of Sustainable Leadership in the Relation between Career Management and Indicators of Sustainable Careers Presenter: Daniel Kooistra; The Open U., Netherlands Presenter: Sara De Hauw; The Open U., Netherlands Presenter: Judith Hilde Semeijn; The Open U., Netherlands Presenter: Beatrice Van Der Heijden; Radboud U. Nijmegen Flexible Work Arrangements and Psychological Contracts in Light of Sustainable Careers Presenter: Jana Retkowsky; Vrije U. Amsterdam Presenter: Jos Akkermans; Vrije U. Amsterdam Presenter: Sanne Nijs; Vrije U. Amsterdam Presenter: Paul G W Jansen; Vrije U. Amsterdam Presenter: Svetlana Khapova; Vrije U. Amsterdam Applying a Multiple Stakeholders’ Perspective on Career Management to Foster Sustainable Careers: The Cases of Project-Based Workers and Dual Earner Employees Presenter: Marijke Verbruggen; KU Leuven Presenter: Ans De Vos; U. of Antwerp/ Antwerp Management School Presenter: Marie Antoine; U. Catholique de Louvain Presenter: Lynn Germeys; KU Leuven Presenter: Francois Pichault; U. of Liege Presenter: Elisabeth Abraham; KU Leuven Presenter: Sofie Jacobs; U. of Liège Presenter: David Stuer; U. of Antwerp/ Antwerp Management School Presenter: Jérôme Sulbout; U. of Liege

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,327
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,599

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,101
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademy of Management ProceedingsMême sujetEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesTravaux en français237 207