MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2964479771 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2019.8a19

The Caucus on Psychotherapy: A Voice for Psychotherapy at APA

2019· article· en· W2964479771 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Mintz

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCaucusPsychotherapistPsychoanalysisPsychologyPsychiatryPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Psychiatry & PsychotherapyFull AccessThe Caucus on Psychotherapy: A Voice for Psychotherapy at APADavid Mintz, M.D.David MintzSearch for more papers by this author, M.D.Published Online:25 Jul 2019https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2019.8a19AbstractAbout 10 years ago, a restructuring at APA for fiscal reasons led to the sunsetting of dozens of committees including the Committee on Psychotherapy by Psychiatrists. Recognizing that this left APA without any gathering place for psychiatrist-psychotherapists and nobody to advocate for the particular interests of this group, Eric Plakun, M.D., the medical director/CEO of the Austen Riggs Center in Stockbridge, Mass., and a handful of others formed the Caucus on Psychotherapy. Now with a membership of over 500, the caucus has evolved into a lively body concerned with preserving the biopsychosocial identity of psychiatry. In marked contrast to other disciplines, where practitioners of different brands of psychotherapy are often embroiled in internecine conflict, the caucus has achieved a “big-tent philosophy” that finds common cause among the different psychotherapies.At this year’s APA Annual Meeting in San Francisco, the caucus met to review the state of the caucus, explore current issues of relevance to psychiatrist- psychotherapists, and consider our priorities.A review of our membership survey revealed the following:We represent every geographic area of APA with the heaviest representation from the Northeast.Nearly half of our members are late-career psychiatrists and a third are established, mid-career psychiatrists.Well over a dozen forms of psychotherapy are represented in the membership, though the majority practice psychodynamic psychiatry.Almost half of the members have solo private practices, with private pay as the most common source of income.More than half are primarily involved in providing combined individual psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy.Almost 20% primarily provide pharmacotherapy but are interested in integrating psychotherapy skills with pharmacotherapy and with preserving psychotherapy as a part of the psychiatric identity.At this meeting, Margaret Tuttle, M.D., a steering committee member and a psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital, reported on our review of the APA website. The main findings were that APA’s outward-facing content consistently recognizes psychotherapy as an important aspect of the psychiatric skillset, but inward-facing content contained virtually no resources for psychiatrist-psychotherapists.In the context of recent threats to good clinical care involving psychotherapy—such as in Ontario where the provincial government mounted an effort to limit all psychotherapy to 24 sessions a year (see page 6)—and a perception, even among caucus members, that research was needed to establish the benefits of longer-term treatment, Susan Lazar, M.D., reported on the well-established evidence supporting longer-term treatments including evidence that such treatments lead to cost savings from symptom reduction (Psychiatric News). She is a clinical professor at George Washington and Georgetown universities and a supervising and training analyst at the Washington Psychoanalytic Institute.Plakun discussed implications of the recent ruling by the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California in Wit v. United Behavioral Health, which strongly supported a biopsychosocial approach to treatment and chastised the insurer for a self-serving approach that was overly restricted to symptom reduction and crisis management. Among other things, the ruling by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero affirmed a fiduciary duty on the part of insurers to rely on a multidimensional assessment in making treatment decisions to address, where possible, underlying conditions and not just symptoms; to use lower levels of care only when those lower levels are likely to be just as effective; and to err on the side of caution when the optimal level of care is not clear.The early career psychiatrist (ECP) members of the caucus’s Steering Committee led a discussion of issues facing ECPs who wish to practice psychotherapy. Anecdotally, most graduating residents are interested in practicing some psychotherapy, but these newly minted psychiatrists commonly face barriers from employers who demand that they “practice at the top of their licenses” and restrict their practice to prescribing.In discussing the challenges of teaching psychotherapy in residency, especially given the growing body of pharmacologic and neuroscience knowledge that must be mastered, there was a collective concern that many graduating residents may not be equipped to practice psychotherapy. Subspecialization training in psychotherapy was discussed as a possible remedy to training issues and to the general decrease in the practice of psychotherapy in psychiatry.Subsequently, the caucus leadership decided to direct its advocacy efforts in a number of directions for the coming year. Those include supporting parity and reimbursement for psychosocial aspects of the psychiatric role, emphasizing psychotherapy as part of the identity/brand of psychiatry, enhancing content on the APA website for psychiatrist-psychotherapists, understanding and addressing impediments to psychotherapeutic practice faced by ECPs, exploring the role of the caucus in optimizing psychotherapy training, and increasing the caucus’s membership, given that the influence of the caucus lies in its members and the size of the membership.Joining is easy. Psychiatrists who are APA members can join directly from their “Member Profile” page on the APA website by clicking on the “specialty interests” tab or by contacting me at [email protected] or our administrator, Lisa Greiner, at [email protected] ■David Mintz, M.D., is the leader of APA’s Caucus on Psychotherapy and director of psychiatric education at the Austen Riggs Center. ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,211
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,338
Écart entre enseignants0,320 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207