Multidisciplinarity in health promotion and the era of planetary health
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In April 2019, the 23rd IUHPE World Conference on Health Promotion fostered the space for health promoters around the world to come together and discuss its theme: ‘Waiora: Promoting planetary health and sustainable development for all’ (IUHPE 2019). With this theme, the conference positioned dominant social and economic paradigms such as colonialism and neo-liberalism, and their role in exacerbating the unequal capacity of communities across the globe to promote their health, as one of the most urgent challenges of our generation. This discussion was framed within Māori knowledge and culture, which (simply put) privileges respectful and sustainable relationships with our natural environments. The expansion of the mandate of health promotion to include planetary health represents a new chapter in its constant re-definition within public health, and in the re-definition of the academic disciplines supporting it. Our paper, awarded with the inaugural Ilona Kickbusch award for Best Paper by an Early Career Academic, highlighted the nature of multidisciplinarity in health promotion, and debated the role of this key characteristic in the capacity of health promotion to survive as a distinct discipline within public health (Gagné et al., 2018). The renewed pledge by conference delegates to situate its mission on a global scale invites a new range of champions focussed on climate change, environmental justice, social development and traditional Indigenous knowledge and cultures. Most public health institutions, however, continue to thrive on legacy disciplines to understand the determinants of health and the means to secure them, thereby challenging the inclusion of the new disciplinary inputs needed to understand and tackle the modern commercial and political underpinnings of health inequities. We make the safe assumption that the debate on multidisciplinary—what it looks like and how it influences the growth of health promotion as a theoretical perspective, field of action and academic institution—is likely to endure in the new era of planetary health. To carry on the mandate of health promotion and ensure its longevity, health promoters need to continue advocating for health equity in the academic, policy and civic domains, and highlight its implications for non-Western countries and future generations. Health promoters also need to be reflexive and critical of their own practices and assumptions, and question their unintended impacts on health inequities across the globe. To accomplish this, we hope that health promoters continue participating in scientific platforms such as the IUHPE World conference and Health Promotion International that support the multidisciplinary nature of research and practice in health promotion. As early career researchers, we support this era by celebrating our disciplinary backgrounds and sources of knowledge, and working to support actions that promote the capacity of communities to develop themselves in a truly sustainable fashion.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,025 | 0,075 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,022 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,043 | 0,045 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».