Interim Results of the Canadian Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Discontinuation Trial for 2nd Attempt of Treatment Free Remission: Treatment Free Remission Accomplished By Dasatinib (TRAD)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Multiple studies have demonstrated that 40-50% of patients can maintain a treatment free remission (TFR) after having achieved a deep and sustained response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for the treatment of CML. However, the remaining 60% of patients require reinitiation of TKI therapy to control the leukemia. Among the TKIs, dasatinib has an additional activity that may be relevant for successful treatment discontinuation: approximately 30% of patients have increased large granular lymphocytes (LGL) and/or natural killer cells. Preliminary analysis indicates the patients with LGL lymphocytosis have a higher likelihood of attaining a deep molecular response than others. Our study is designed to determine if re-treatment with dasatinib (DA) after an initial failure to maintain TFR after imatininb (IM) discontinuation will lead to a second successful TKI discontinuation with sustained TFR. Methods and materials: This prospective clinical trial (BMS CA180543, NCT#02268370) includes all major CML treatment centers across Canada (n=12). The study has 3 phases: 1) IM discontinuation, 2) DA rechallenge, and 3) DA discontinuation. The planned enrollment is 117 pts. Key inclusion criteria include: 1) CML in chronic phase, 2) total duration of IM therapy of minimum 3 yrs, 3) total duration of MR4.5 or deeper response over 2 yrs with 2 consecutive confirmed MR4.5 or deeper response with a 3 month interval. Key exclusion criteria include prior allogeneic stem cell transplant or prior accelerated or blastic phase CML. Molecular relapse was defined as an increase in BCR-ABL transcript level above MR4.0 on at least two consecutive occasions, or a single increase in BCR-ABL transcript level above MR3.0. DA is started at a dose of 100mg daily once molecular relapse is confirmed. The primary objective is to determine the proportion of patients who remain in molecular remission (defined as maintaining ≥MR4.0) after DA discontinuation after achieving ≥MR4.5 although the primary endpoint has not been evaluated yet. Results: The study was started in March 2015. As of July 21 2017, 147 pts were screened of whom 23 pts did not qualify due to 1) screening failure (n=15) or 2) consent withdrawal (n=8). Ultimately 118 pts were enrolled into IM discontinuation phase, and 108 pts are ongoing with 7 additional patients on screening awaiting enrollment. Of 107 pts evaluated for molecular relapse, 41 pts (38.3%) lost molecular response defined as loss of major molecular response only (MMR; n=7), loss of MR4 on 2 consecutive tests only (n=9) or both (n=25). The 12 month relapse free survival (RFS) rate was estimated as 56.8% (46.1-66.1%), while TFR rate using loss of MMR as an event was 66.6% (56.2-75.1%) at 12 months. Of 41 pts who lost molecular response, currently 40 pts are in DA rechallenge phase with 37 of these patients who have already been on DA for at least 1 month. Thirty-five patients achieved MMR. The median time to MMR, MR4.0 and MR4.5 was 55 days, 56 days and 66 days, respectively. Cox9s proportional hazard regression model suggested a strong correlation of RFS with total duration of IM therapy prior to IM discontinuation (p Out of 40 pts treated with DA at molecular relapse, 7 pts have attained MR4.5 or deeper response over 12 months and have discontinued DA therapy. Two pts have lost MMR at day 61 and 125 respectively after DA discontinuation. The other five pts are currently being monitored monthly for BCR-ABL transcript level at day 6, 41, 67, 75 and 122 after DA discontinuation without losing molecular response. Conclusion: The preliminary results of this Canadian TKI discontinuation trial show a RFS rate of 56.8% after IM discontinuation, consistent with the results observed in other TKI discontinuation studies. DA can be safely administered in CML patients who lose molecular response after IM discontinuation with 100% of MMR rate at 3 months. Prolonged duration of IM duration, or MR4/MR4.5 duration with IM increases TFR success by 11-17% per year. Disclosures Kim: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Paladin: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Bence-Bruckler: Lundbeck: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Savoie: Lundbeck: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Busque: Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Canada Inc.: Honoraria; Bristol Myer Squibb: Honoraria; Paladin: Honoraria. Delage: BMS: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Laneuville: BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Paladin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Liew: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kamel-Reid: BMS: Research Funding. Lipton: BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Leber: Celgene Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».