MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2966000595 · doi:10.1177/2325967119s00338

Expanding the Potential of Nonoperative Therapies In Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis: Treatment Response to Repeat Administration Triamcinolone Acetonide Extended-Release Is Similar Across Kellgren-Lawrence Grades 2-4

2019· article· en· W2966000595 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deryk G. Jones, Andreas H. Gomoll, John C. Richmond, Andrew I. Spitzer, Virginia B. Kraus, Kim M. Huffman, Amy Çinar, Joelle Lufkin, Scott D. Kelley

Notice bibliographique

RevueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTriamcinolone acetonideOsteoarthritisWOMACAdverse effectKnee painSurgeryPhysical therapyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objectives: Triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) is approved in the US to treat pain associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Intra-articular corticosteroids (IACS) are often used to manage recurrence of pain and symptoms during the prolonged course of OA. Effectiveness of IACS in advanced knee OA is unknown, and lack of effective nonoperative treatments may accelerate consideration of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This post hoc subgroup analysis of a Phase 3b, single-arm, open-label study (NCT03046446) evaluated the efficacy of initial and repeat administration TA ER in knee OA with a range of radiographic severity classified by Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade. Methods: Patients aged ≥40 years with symptomatic knee OA for ≥6 months, KL Grade 2-4, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) -A (pain) total sum score ≥6, and index knee pain for >15 days during the prior month received the 1st injection of TA-ER on Day 1. Patients received the 2nd injection at the first visit (Week 12, 16, 20, or 24) at which repeat dose criteria were met (ie, patient benefited from and tolerated the 1st injection without safety concerns and was clinically indicated to receive the 2nd injection). Patients who received 2 injections were evaluated every 4 weeks up to 52 weeks after the 1st injection. Patients who did not benefit from the 1st injection at Week 12 completed at Week 12. Patients who did not meet repeat dose criteria by Week 24 completed at Week 24. Safety was evaluated via treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and by index-knee radiography at end of study. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included WOMAC A (pain), -B (stiffness), C (function), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life following each injection. Results: Of 208 enrolled patients, 179 received 2 injections. Of these, 56 (31.3%) had KL Grade 2, 68 (38.0%) had KL Grade 3, and 55 (30.7%) had KL Grade 4. The patient population reflected the ‘real-world’ knee OA population (Table). Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were generally similar across KL grade subgroups; however, as expected, age and time since OA diagnosis increased with KL grade. Prior index-knee OA treatments did not correlate with KL grade except for increased use of IA hyaluronic acid. The incidence of TEAEs and index-knee TEAEs were similar across KL grades (Table). Most TEAEs were Grade 1 or Grade 2 and there were no unexpected TEAEs. There were no indications of chondrolysis, osteonecrosis, subchondral insufficiency fractures, or clinically significant subchondral bone changes in any subgroup. Response rates for the 1st injection and median times to 2nd injection were 95% and 120 days for KL Grade 4, 96% and 118 days for KL Grade 3 and 94% and 113 days for KL Grade 2. Regardless of KL grade, mean WOMAC-A (pain) scores were comparable following injections (Figure). At 12 weeks after both the 1st and 2nd injections, mean scores were similar for patients with KL Grade 4 (1.34 and 1.36), KL Grade 3 (1.37 each), and KL Grade 2 (1.24 and 1.20) (Figure). Conclusion: Overall and across baseline KL grades, repeat administration of TA-ER using a dosing schedule tailored to patient response was well tolerated, with no radiographic evidence for an impact on cartilage. In this ‘real-world’ patient population, TA-ER reliably reduced OA symptoms with similar improvements observed after both injections across KL grade subgroups, including those with KL Grade 4 who may otherwise be considering TKA. [Table: see text][Figure: see text]

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports MedicineMême sujetOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsTravaux en français237 207