The role of architecture and craft for the Ontario weekend dwelling
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The spatial divide between work, home, and leisure provoked the development of secondary properties dedicated to recreation in natural environments, known as weekend dwellings. Canadians have formed a unique relationship with the weekend dwelling. As a country, Canada is united in the cultural importance of weekend dwellings however, the terminology and context of weekend dwellings is argued across Canada. Out of the large collection of terms, the most popular choices for Canadian weekend dwellings are cabin, cottage, and camp. Ontarians are locked in a linguistic debate between the northern Ontario camp and the southern Ontario cottage. Southern Ontario’s cottage country began in Georgian Bay during the 1800s with American hunting and fishing lodges.1 Camp, as a permanent weekend dwelling has its linguistic roots in the collection of rustic buildings that comprise logging camps.2 While the terms camp and cottage are not synonyms, they both hold the connotation of a self-built single-family structure that is integrated with nature. Contemporary weekend dwellings are permanent structures. Both the camp and cottage have the ability to inspire a sensation of being “away”. The Ontario weekend dwelling’s sense of away is fourfold: the journey, the physical structure, the active dwelling, and the return. Historically the sense of away was achieved through a lengthy train ride and the transition to a steamer. In modern Ontario where morning commutes can be as long as the journey to the weekend dwelling it is important to distinguish travel from journey. Weekend dwellings can be comprised of multiple architectural interventions. These physical structures play a primary role in our understanding of being away. If the architecture closely resembles experiences in the primary dwelling there is no distinction between place, and there is only geographical separated from the everyday.3 Actively engaging in the environment, weekend dwellings offer the opportunity to practice agency over one’s actions. Active dwelling is the collection of practices exhibited at weekend dwellings that differ from those at primary dwellings. The collective memory of place is a culture that both creates and is created by the place. Returning to the weekend dwelling builds that collective memory and cements the sensation of being away. However, the single-family weekend dwelling model has become economically inaccessible to the vast majority of Canadians. Using the framework of the sensation of being away this thesis looks to develop a structure that can preserve the importance of craft from the self-built single-family weekend dwelling into a shared lodge typology. The design of a learning lodge prioritizes craft and respectful building solutions with the ability to impart knowledge of how to live gently on the land, through a set of building details.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,031 | 0,015 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».