Predictors of Hydroxyurea Use in Children with Sickle Cell Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Since hydroxyurea emerged as an effective therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD), there have been numerous studies that have demonstrated its safety and efficacy in children and adults with SCD. In their 2014 guidelines, the NHLBI recommended that hydroxyurea treatment should be offered to all infants and children with sickle cell anemia (HbSS and HbS/beta0 thalassemia) starting at 9 months of age. However, hydroxyurea is underused among children and adolescents with SCD and to date, there have been no studies that have identified the specific determinants that may predict hydroxyurea adherence in these patients. Objectives: 1. To identify predictors of hydroxyurea adherence in children with SCD. 2. To measure the rate of hydroxyurea use among CHEO patients with SCD who were born between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2015; and 3. To compare the rates of SCD-related complications between patients who were not prescribed hydroxyurea, patients who were adherent to hydroxyurea and patients who were not adherent to hydroxyurea Methods: We extracted medical chart data to identify patients with SCD who were born between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2015. Patients were classified as either "Not prescribed hydroxyurea" or "Prescribed hydroxyurea" based on clinical documentation and the presence of at least one hydroxyurea outpatient prescription. For those patients who were prescribed hydroxyurea, hematological indices were collected and analyzed over time to estimate adherence to hydroxyurea. To measure the adherence of children prescribed hydroxyurea, we examined the trends in the patient's hematological indices after their first prescription of hydroxyurea. Adherence was defined as increased hematological indices (from baseline) by greater than or equal to any 2 of the following: Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) by 10 fL; Hemoglobin levels (g/L) by 10 g/L and/or %HbF (fetal hemoglobin) by 10%. We measured the frequency of disease-related complications among CHEO patients with SCD according to their use of hydroxyurea and used multivariate analyses to evaluate immigration status, newborn screening status, SCD subtype, SCD complications, income, age and sex as predictors for hydroxyurea adherence. Results: Children with HbSS were more likely to have been prescribed hydroxyurea compared to children with HbSC (87.8% vs. 9.5%). Canadian citizenship, newborn hemoglobinopathy screening and lower familial income were associated with better hydroxyurea adherence (Table 1). Although the association was not statistically significant, patients were more likely to be prescribed hydroxyurea if they were from a lower income background (61.9% for lowest and second lowest quartiles vs. 38.1% for third and highest quintiles). Patients were also more likely to adhere to hydroxyurea if they did not have private medical insurance for hydroxyurea coverage (Table 1). Finally, hydroxyurea adherence was associated with reduced rates of health care utilization and SCD-related complications (Table 2). Conclusions: In line with previous studies of hydroxyurea for the treatment of SCD, patients who were adherent to hydroxyurea had fewer complications compared to those patients who were either non-adherent to or not prescribed hydroxyurea. Similarly, patients had fewer complications after being prescribed hydroxyurea compared to before they started hydroxyurea with a reduction in the rate of ED visits, acute chest syndromes, complications, transfusions and hospitalizations. Patients from non-immigrant families, patients who were identified through newborn hemoglobinopathy screening and patients from lower income families were more likely to be adherent to hydroxyurea. Although the results of this study were limited by its small sample size, further studies will clarify these determinants of hydroxyurea adherence among SCD patients and enable clinicians to improve hydroxyurea adherence for SCD patients. Disclosures Klaassen: Shire: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma AG: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy; Cangene: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».