MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2967774770 · doi:10.1353/tech.2019.0086

The Unreliable Nation: Hostile Nature and Technological Failure in the Cold War by Edward Jones-Imhotep

2019· article· en· W2967774770 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTechnology and Culture · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCold warPhoneHistoryTelecommunicationsEngineeringPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Unreliable Nation: Hostile Nature and Technological Failure in the Cold War by Edward Jones-Imhotep Ron Kline (bio) The Unreliable Nation: Hostile Nature and Technological Failure in the Cold War. By Edward Jones-Imhotep. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017. Pp. 312. Hardcover $35. The Unreliable Nation is a well-written, well-researched, and welcome addition to the growing body of literature that brings together the history of technology and environmental history. The book stands out for its sophisticated thesis, which views historical conceptions of technology, nature, and national identity through the lens of technological failure—not the failure of technological innovations, such as AT&T's picture phone in the 1960s, but the failure of machines to function as they were intended to function. At first glance, the site for Jones-Imhotep's study—which is well-grounded in recent secondary literature in the history and sociology of science and technology—seems to be too specialized to support a broad thesis: the production of ionograms (graphs of the ionosphere's ability to reflect short-wave radio signals) by a field laboratory of the Canadian Defense Research Telecommunications Establishment (DRTE) in the Cold War. Jones-Imhotep analyzes well the difficulties encountered by the DRTE in producing ionograms over the course of twenty years, from using radar-like ionosondes and cathode-ray tube displays in a network of ground stations, to employing a satellite and a computer data-processing system they had designed. The ionograms enabled military and other defense agencies to increase the reliability of trans-oceanic and intercontinental communications and electronic espionage (signals intelligence), and allowed them the capability to detect enemy aircraft and ballistic missiles crossing over the North Pole from the Soviet Union. What enables this case study to say so much about the general theme of the nexus between technology, nature, and identity is how deftly Jones-Imhotep analyzes the changing relationships between a "machinic order" and a hostile "natural order" in regard to the national identity of the Canadian North. For the DRTE, the hostile North manifested itself in terms of sporadic magnetic storms, aurora displays, and other ionospheric disturbances, which they mapped and theorized by constantly producing and studying ionograms of a changing natural order. This multi-faceted approach allows Jones-Imhotep to conclude that: Reacting to what they saw as the multiple threats facing the [Canadian] nation after World War II, government officials and defense scientists seized on the radio failure of the North—in all its territorial, cultural, and political ambiguity—as a way of leveraging geographical vulnerability into political power, influence, and distinctive identity. While those associations drew on long-standing [End Page 921] myths about the place of the North and of communications in the nation's history, DRTE's research inverted the traditional relationship between natural order, environment, and technology in Canada, taking the age-old sympathy between technologies and natural orders, recasting them as antagonists, and locating their point of opposition in the problematic behavior of machines that threatened the nation's survival. (pp. 216–17) As good as the book is, I would have liked to have heard more about expressions of Canada's national identity in the Cold War and the machinic order of the systems that used the results of the DRTE's mapping of the ionosphere to improve their reliability. Jones-Imhotep brings to life the scientific and engineering practices of creating ionograms in the field and later in the computer center. We learn a good deal about ionosondes, the Alouette satellite, and the CDC 3200 computer. But we learn much less about the short-wave radios, electronic-espionage equipment, and radar sets that failed to function properly because of the hostile ionosphere. For example, the Distant Early Warning (DEW) Line, the massive Cold War radar network built by AT&T across northern Canada for the U.S. and Canadian air forces, is only mentioned in regard to its operators testing the reception of short-wave signals from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Jones-Imhotep does, however, discuss how the DRTE devised for the Royal Canadian Air Force an adaptable communication system that could work around ionospheric disturbances. I highly recommend this book...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,675
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,547

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,198
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle