MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2969388631 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30156-2

Are we facing an opioid crisis in Europe?

2019· letter· en· W2969388631 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katia Verhamme, Arthur M. Bohnen

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Public Health · 2019
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOpioidOpioid epidemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MEDLINEMedicine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PsychiatryPolitical scienceVirologyInternal medicineLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the past 15 years, an increasing use of opioids has been reported in the USA and Canada, coinciding with an increase in opioid addiction, opioid-related morbidity, and opioid-related mortality. Indeed, in the USA approximately 130 patients die from an overdose of prescription opioids each day.1hhs.gov/opioidsGoogle ScholarWhat is the U.S. opioid epidemic?. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Jan 22, 2019https://www.hhs.gov/opioids/about-the-epidemic/index.htmlDate accessed: July 25, 2019Google Scholar The opioid epidemic has been well documented in the USA and Canada, but fewer data are available for Europe.2Helmerhorst GT Teunis T Janssen SJ Ring D An epidemic of the use, misuse and overdose of opioids and deaths due to overdose, in the United States and Canada: is Europe next?.Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B: 856-864Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar In The Lancet Public Health, Kalkman and colleagues3Kalkman GA Kramers C van Dongen RT van den Brink W Schellekens A Trends in use and misuse of opioids in the Netherlands: a retrospective, multi-source database study.Lancet Public Health. 2019; (published online Aug 20.)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30128-8Scopus (91) Google Scholar report important results from a retrospective, multi-source database study investigating opioid use as well as proxies for opioid misuse in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2017. The authors show that, over this 10-year period, the overall number of opioid prescriptions nearly doubled, mainly because of an increase in oxycodone users from 574 to approximately 2500 per 100 000 inhabitants. Misuse of prescription opioids also grew. The authors report increases in the number of hospital admissions related to prescription opioid intoxication, in the proportion of patients receiving addiction care for prescription opioid use disorder, and in prescription opioid-related mortality over the study period. In this same period the number of patients receiving addiction care for heroin use disorder and substitution therapy decreased whereas the mortality rate and hospitalisation for heroin and substitution therapy remained stable. Nevertheless, opioid misuse in the Netherlands is still substantially lower than in the USA and Canada. Data from the 2018 report by the International Narcotics Control Board show that the USA is the number one consumer of narcotic drugs, with 40 240 defined daily dosages of opioids per million inhabitants per day. In second place is Germany with 28 862 defined daily dosages per 1 million inhabitants, followed by Canada with 26 029. The Netherlands is in ninth place, with 16 114 defined daily dosages per 1 million inhabitants. Although the USA is the number one consumer, a 13% decrease in consumption was observed compared with the previous report from 2014–16, whereas an 8% increase was observed for the Netherlands. This suggests that preventive measures taken in the USA such as physician awareness and new policies for opioid prescribing are starting to pay off.4Zhu W Chernew ME Sherry TB Maestas N Initial opioid prescriptions among U.S. commercially insured patients, 2012–2017.N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1043-1052Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar, 5Stoicea N Costa A Periel L Uribe A Weaver T Bergese SD Current perspectives on the opioid crisis in the US healthcare system: a comprehensive literature review.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98e15425Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar In the Netherlands, 83 individuals died because of prescription opioid overdose in 2017, with an incidence of 0·5 deaths per 100 000 inhabitants. In the USA, opioid-related mortality is ten times higher, with 5·2 deaths per 100 000 inhabitants in 2016.6Seth P Rudd RA Noonan RK Haegerich TM Quantifying the epidemic of prescription opioid overdose deaths.Am J Public Health. 2018; 108: 500-502Crossref PubMed Scopus (271) Google Scholar This lower mortality in the Netherlands might be related to differences in health-care access, better patient monitoring, and avoidance of chronic opioid use, which is a known risk factor of misuse and overdose.4Zhu W Chernew ME Sherry TB Maestas N Initial opioid prescriptions among U.S. commercially insured patients, 2012–2017.N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1043-1052Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar Although Kalkman and colleagues3Kalkman GA Kramers C van Dongen RT van den Brink W Schellekens A Trends in use and misuse of opioids in the Netherlands: a retrospective, multi-source database study.Lancet Public Health. 2019; (published online Aug 20.)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30128-8Scopus (91) Google Scholar could not investigate the duration of opioid use, a recent paper7Schepens MHJ Leusink M de Vries SE et al.[Increase in opioid prescribing in extramural care in the Netherlands: assessment of use and prescription behaviour, based on claims data].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2019; 163 (pii D3854 (in Dutch).)PubMed Google Scholar on extramural opioid use in the Netherlands reported that most opioids (79%) were prescribed for short durations (<4 months). Thus, although the use of opioids (in particular oxycodone) is on the rise in the Netherlands, epidemic proportions have not yet been reached. The opioid epidemic in the USA has been attributed to multiple factors, including the publication of influential reports stating that opioids were safe, aggressive marketing, existence of so-called pill mills (pharmacies or clinics that inappropriately dispense opioids), and new attitudes towards pain management.2Helmerhorst GT Teunis T Janssen SJ Ring D An epidemic of the use, misuse and overdose of opioids and deaths due to overdose, in the United States and Canada: is Europe next?.Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B: 856-864Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar, 8Lyapustina T Rutkow L Chang HY et al.Effect of a “pill mill” law on opioid prescribing and utilization: the case of Texas.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016; 159: 190-197Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar This situation is different from the Netherlands, where public marketing by pharmaceutical companies is not allowed and pill mills do not exist. Instead, the increase in opioid use has been related to easy access to opioid drugs (through GPs and specialists, and for legitimate medical needs), aversion to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and more attention to pain therapy. Indeed, opioids are no longer only used to treat cancer pain, but also for the symptomatic relief of non-cancer related chronic pain. Moreover, patients are being discharged sooner after surgery for health economic purposes, so acute pain relief has become more important. Adequate pain relief is one of the quality indicators used by the Dutch government to benchmark hospitals.9Baker DW The joint commission and the opioid epidemic—reply.JAMA. 2017; 318: 92Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar A limitation of the study by Kalkman and colleagues3Kalkman GA Kramers C van Dongen RT van den Brink W Schellekens A Trends in use and misuse of opioids in the Netherlands: a retrospective, multi-source database study.Lancet Public Health. 2019; (published online Aug 20.)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30128-8Scopus (91) Google Scholar is that the authors were not able to investigate risk factors for opioid misuse, as information on patient sex, age, and mental health status, type of prescriber, and indication of use was not available. Additionally, codeine was excluded from all analyses because it is not exclusively prescribed for pain relief, and the paracetamol-codeine combination tablet is no longer reimbursed in the Netherlands since 2013. Safe and appropriate use of opiates is crucial, and the findings presented by Kalkman and colleagues3Kalkman GA Kramers C van Dongen RT van den Brink W Schellekens A Trends in use and misuse of opioids in the Netherlands: a retrospective, multi-source database study.Lancet Public Health. 2019; (published online Aug 20.)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30128-8Scopus (91) Google Scholar are a call for action. In the Netherlands more than 80% of opioids are prescribed by general practitioners, so the primary care standard on chronic pain was recently updated to highlight the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to pain management and of restricting the indication of opioids. Other key topics for research are non-addictive painkillers stronger than paracetamol or NSAIDS, and evidence-based methods to effectively treat opioid addiction in those who misuse these drugs. Finally, the public perception of pain treatment should be addressed—discussing the pros and cons, informing patients, and agreeing on realistic goals might prevent addiction. KMCV works for a research group who received unconditional grants from Yamanouchi, Pfizer/Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline, none of which are related to the content of this work. AMB declares no competing interests. Trends in use and misuse of opioids in the Netherlands: a retrospective, multi-source database studyPrescription opioid use increased substantially between 2008 and 2017, and several proxies for misuse show a parallel increasing trend. Although the Netherlands is far from the opioid epidemic faced by the USA, safe opioid prescribing guidelines should be implemented to prevent further escalation and to keep opioid painkillers available for those in need. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,134
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations73
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Public HealthMême sujetOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentTravaux en français237 207