Physiotherapists’ Perspectives on the Threats Facing Their Profession in the Areas of Leadership, Burnout, and Branding: A Pan-Canadian Perspective from the Physio Moves Canada Project, Part 3
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: Physiotherapist is the professional designation of those who provide physiotherapy (PT). Physiotherapists have earned a reputation as important providers of medical and non-medical rehabilitation for Canadians after injury, illness, or surgery. Despite the fact that physiotherapy has a nearly 100-year presence in Canada, some would suggest that practitioners arguably remain under-recognized for the value they offer to the spectrum of health care. Method: In the latter half of 2017, a cross-Canada qualitative study was conducted through which a subgroup of physiotherapists in every Canadian province and in Yukon Territory volunteered to share their perspectives on the threats facing the current practice of physiotherapy in the next 5–15 years. The data were collected from a series of nominal-group-technique-based focus groups and one-on-one interviews and then analyzed to condense the ideas generated into themes. A total of 117 physiotherapy professionals participated in focus sessions or one-on-one interviews as part of the Physio Moves Canada project, which was set up to explore, capture, and synthesize the perspectives of academics, front-line clinicians, and administrators on the future of the profession. Results: This article, the third in a series, describes the results of the descriptive thematic analysis of three identified threats: issues pertaining to professional leadership and direction, clinician burnout, and clarity of the physiotherapy brand. Informed by 11 sub-themes, the results suggest that participants were concerned about the ability of the professional body to mobilize toward shared and common goals while simultaneously defending against external pressures and internal disagreements on what exactly physiotherapy as a discipline is meant to be. Many respondents also identified reasons for optimism if the professional community is able to work together as a large and motivated single entity. Conclusions: The findings are described in terms of possible directions for priority investment of resources or critical reflection by professional leadership, educators, and regulators.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».