MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2969485896 · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000002944

In Memoriam: Brian Kavanagh, 1962 to 2019

2019· article· en· W2969485896 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Beverley A. Orser, Laurent Brochard

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnesthesiology · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Établissements canadiensHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It is with great sadness that we recognize the passing, on June 15, 2019, of Dr. Brian Patrick Kavanagh: a brilliant scientist, an astute clinician, and a passionate mentor.Brian was a tireless investigator whose capacity for research excellence was exceptional in the fields of anesthesiology and critical care. He was highly productive as both a preclinical and a clinical investigator, all the while juggling senior administrative roles and major editorial commitments. He had that rare ability to move seamlessly between the bedside and the laboratory, always asking fundamental and difficult questions.Dr. Kavanagh’s prowess as an academic leader was evident early in his career. He graduated in 1985 from University College Dublin in Ireland, receiving the Maginnis Gold Medal in Medicine from St. Vincent’s University Hospital (Dublin, Ireland). He obtained his Medical Membership in the Royal College of Physicians (United Kingdom) in 1988. He started residency training in internal medicine in Dublin but then moved to the University of Toronto (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) to begin residency training in anesthesia in 1989. During his postgraduate training, he received several prestigious awards, including a Resident Research Award from the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and the Residents Research Essay Contest Award from the American Society of Anesthesiologists. The awards continued to accrue throughout his career, and his research was ultimately recognized by a Fellowship in the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences and Honorary Fellowship in the College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland. In June 2019, he received a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair, one of the most prestigious sources of support awarded to Canadian scientists.He started fellowship training in critical care medicine at the University of Toronto and then continued at Stanford University (Stanford, California) under the research supervision of Dr. Ronald Pearl and the mentorship of Dr. H. Barrie Fairley, who was Chair of the Department of Anesthesia at the time. Brian returned to Toronto General Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) in 1994. He moved to the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) in 1999 and worked as a clinician–scientist in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit at the Department of Critical Care Medicine and the SickKids Research Institute until the end of his life.Brian’s leadership abilities led to his appointment as Chair of the Department of Anesthesia at the University of Toronto, a position in which he served from 2006 to 2017. The department is the largest within this discipline in Canada, encompassing more than 600 faculty members, residents, fellows, and medical students. During his tenure as Chair, Brian initiated the Merit Awards Program, which now provides almost $1 million of research support annually to faculty members. He was also a successful fundraiser who established seven endowed research chairs. Through his remarkable legacy, the department now ranks as one of the top in the world.Brian authored many landmark studies. One of his most frequently cited works was a review of preemptive analgesia and neuroplasticity.1 His research subsequently transitioned to ways of improving lung function and avoiding ventilator-induced lung injury. His articles were published in the high-impact anesthesiology and critical care journals. His research was always mechanistic, innovative, and insightful and often demonstrated that he was “thinking outside the box.” He was a brilliant researcher and physiologist, a dedicated clinician, and a passionate teacher. He loved to take the high view of our practice of medicine, to reflect on issues such as “protocolized” versus individualized and physiology-based medicine, and to analyze the ways in which clinical research tends to be performed nowadays.2Brian played a major role in describing the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury and how mechanical ventilation interacts with the atelectatic lungs of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.3 He contributed to identifying the cell signaling pathways and mediators that promote lung injury.4 He showed that lung injury occurred only in the part of the lung where ventilation was delivered, whereas bronchiolar injury affected the whole lung. Recently, he showed that spontaneous breathing reopened parts of atelectatic lung and thus could paradoxically worsen lung injury in the most severe cases.5 He also discovered that an increase in carbon dioxide was protective against ventilator-induced lung injury.6 However, before advocating for the therapeutic use of hypercapnia, he recognized that prolonged exposure to carbon dioxide could reduce antimicrobial activity and that the astute clinician should balance risks and benefits.7More recently, he described new mechanisms of lung injury that may have important clinical implications, mostly related to vascular phenomena.8,9 He continued to explore the distribution of ventilation and atelectasis in the lung and invented a technique for generating negative pressure in the abdomen.10 Researchers are now using this method to recruit the lung in the laboratory, and the first clinical trials will be starting soon (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03425318). He was passionate about the clinical implications and applications of his research, as illustrated by his latest publication, which describes visualizing the distribution of ventilation at the bedside to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure.11 The results of his studies have changed and will continue to change clinical practice and to inspire researchers and clinicians.In addition to publishing reports of his own research, Brian contributed to the scientific community an editor and peer reviewer. He served as a wise and trusted member of the Editorial Board of the journal Anesthesiology for many years, including as Executive Editor. At the time of his death, he was successfully leading a major effort to increase the content, richness, and reach of critical care research in Anesthesiology. He also served as an Associate Editor of Critical Care. Even during times of illness, he remained committed to his editorial duties, sending out email correspondence to request article reviews or offer support to authors on their manuscripts.Brian’s sharp intellect and quick wit were most evident when he was addressing a crowd. His lectures were singularly compelling, often funny, and always profound. He enjoyed rigorous debate and never shied away from controversy. He was also a committed mentor who excited a generation of young investigators. Many of his mentees now hold senior academic positions around the world. He was always generous with his time, willing to take phone calls at all hours. Without hesitation, he would proof grant applications, correct manuscripts, and freely offer career advice.Unbeknownst to many, Brian was an accomplished musician who played the uilleann or “elbow” pipes, the national bagpipe of Ireland. He was an avid reader who often cited William Butler Yeats, yet he also had a great fondness for the outdoors. Brian’s close friends certainly knew that he was not “all work and no play.” In the citation for his Honorary Fellowship in the Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine of Ireland, Dr. John Laffey noted that Brian would often travel with his pipes so that he could participate in a session at the local Irish pub. He was something of a fitness fanatic, generally arriving in the gym before 6 o’clock in the morning.The international community of anesthesiologists and intensivists has lost a giant far too early. We extend our sincere sympathies to his daughters, Dáire and Aifric Kavanagh, and to his extended family, colleagues, and friends.The authors are not supported by, nor maintain any financial interest in, any commercial activity that may be associated with the topic of this article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,055

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,037
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0070,004
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,019
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,021

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnesthesiologyMême sujetCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesTravaux en français237 207