MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W296969463

MACROVARIABLES IN DETERMINING THE EXCHANGE RATE OF THE U.S. DOLLAR AND MAJOR CURRENCIES

2008· article· en· W296969463 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammed Ashraful Haque, Joan Brumm

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of economics and economic education research · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPurchasing power parityRelative purchasing power parityExchange rateInternational Fisher effectCovered interest arbitrageEconomicsInterest rate parityArbitrageMonetary economicsLiberian dollarFinancial economicsInternational economicsInterest rateReal interest rateNominal interest rateFinance
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION The most well established theories of exchange rate determination are Purchasing Power Parity and Interest Rate Parity. If the absolute Purchasing Power Parity holds, this means that exchange rate is determined by relative prices in two countries and there would be no opportunity for arbitrage profit by speculating in the foreign exchange market. It has been found that although Purchasing Power Parity holds in the long run between the United States and other industrialized countries, Purchasing Power Parity does not hold between the United States and other developing countries. Therefore, there is reason to believe that exchange rate is determined not only by Purchasing Power Parity but there are other variables which are unique to each country for determining exchange rate. The absolute form of Purchasing Power Parity implies that if exchange rate changes deviates from PPP it affects the competitiveness of a country in international trade (Haque, 2003). Empirical studies failed to prove PPP holds, nevertheless, it remains a valid theory for Academicians and practitioners. If you are planning to take a job in Bangladesh, converting your U.S. salary into Bangladesh taka, it will not give you the true purchasing power, because cost of living in Bangladesh may be significantly lower. Most of the empirical study on Purchasing Power Parity has given negative results; therefore, this study tries to find what variables are important in determining exchange rate for each individual country. The results clearly indicate that even within the OECD and European Union countries there is significant difference in cost of living in different countries (Vachris & Thomas, 1999). The theory of Interest Rate Parity holds that one cannot make arbitrage profit by speculating in foreign exchange market due to different interest rate in different countries. Let us say for example that interest rate is 8 percent in the U.S. and 6 percent in U.K. Investors in U.K. will want to transfer funds to the U.S. to invest at the higher prevailing interest rate. Suppose they have a 3 month investment horizon, at the end of 3 months the pound will appreciate against the dollar. Because of the depreciation of the dollar, the U.K. investor will receive fewer pounds which will wipe out any gain made from the higher interest rate in the U.S. Therefore, the British investor will not be any better off by investing in the U.S. to take advantage of the higher interest rates. In order for the British investor to make any gain, the investor buys dollar in the spot market and sells dollar in the forward market. The opportunity to make this arbitrage profit will induce all British investors to buy dollar in the spot market and sell dollar in the forward market. This will cause an appreciation of the dollar in the spot market and depreciation of the dollar in the forward market until equilibrium is reached and arbitrage profit is wiped out. In a study it was found that although Interest Rate Parity holds for the most part between the U.S.A. and other industrialized countries, it does not hold between the U.S.A. and developing countries, therefore it is possible to make arbitrage profit in foreign exchange speculation through covered interest arbitrage (Haque, 2003). Uncovered Interest Rate Parity suggests that existence of different interest rates in different countries can be explained by expected changes in exchange rates, although, empirically this theory does not hold (Micheal & Christensen, 1999). Therefore, one could reasonable argue that there are other factors besides interest rates that influence exchange rate determination. Since it is found thus far that neither Purchasing Power Parity or Interest Rate Parity alone or combined determines exchange rates, there are other variables that are unique in determining exchange rates for different countries. This study was undertaken to determine whether the exchange rate of the dollar is dependent upon some macrovariables, especially against its major trading partners Canada, Europe, Japan and also the SDR. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,081
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,384

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,178
Tête enseignante GPT0,318
Écart entre enseignants0,139 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of economics and economic education researchMême sujetMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactTravaux en français237 207