MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2969793212 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30165-3

Essential medicines and essential diagnostics: a package deal

2019· letter· en· W2969793212 sur OpenAlex
Madhukar Pai, Kāmini Walia, Catharina Boehme

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Public Health · 2019
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiquePharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEssential medicinesMedicineFamily medicinePublic healthNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

For more than 40 years, WHO has published Model Lists of Essential Medicines. This year, for the first time, WHO published the latest edition of the essential medicines list1WHOWorld Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines. 2019; (21st list 2019. July 9)https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325771/WHO-MVP-EMP-IAU-2019.06-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yDate accessed: July 27, 2019Google Scholar simultaneously with a Model List of Essential In Vitro Diagnostics.2WHOSecond WHO Model List of Essential In Vitro Diagnostics.https://www.who.int/medical_devices/publications/Standalone_document_v8.pdf?ua=1Date accessed: July 23, 2019Google Scholar This landmark development signals the vital importance of linking use of medicines with diagnostic tests to advance the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) agenda.3Pai M Boehme C Kickbusch I Diagnostics are essential for universal health coverage to succeed.https://www.statnews.com/2019/05/20/diagnostics-universal-health-coverage-succeed/Date accessed: July 24, 2019Google Scholar All efficient and responsive health systems need both diagnostics and drugs. They are a package deal. Unfortunately, most governments, health agencies, and financial donors in low-income and middle-income countries have traditionally prioritised medicines, with little investment in diagnostics.3Pai M Boehme C Kickbusch I Diagnostics are essential for universal health coverage to succeed.https://www.statnews.com/2019/05/20/diagnostics-universal-health-coverage-succeed/Date accessed: July 24, 2019Google Scholar Without dependable tests, primary care providers have no choice but to rely on empirical therapies, resulting in the widespread use of antibiotics and other drugs. This tendency is illustrated in standardised patient studies in multiple countries, which show that care providers rarely asked for any diagnostic testing.4Das J Woskie L Rajbhandari R Abbasi K Jha A Rethinking assumptions about delivery of healthcare: implications for universal health coverage.BMJ. 2018; 361: k1716Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar Instead, they relied heavily on polypharmacy for several conditions. Underdiagnosis is also evident in analyses of cascades of care for common conditions such as tuberculosis, HIV, diabetes, and hypertension, which show that diagnosis is consistently the weakest link in health system performance.3Pai M Boehme C Kickbusch I Diagnostics are essential for universal health coverage to succeed.https://www.statnews.com/2019/05/20/diagnostics-universal-health-coverage-succeed/Date accessed: July 24, 2019Google Scholar When health systems neglect diagnostics, they cannot adequately respond to growing threats such as antimicrobial resistance, non-communicable diseases, and pandemics.3Pai M Boehme C Kickbusch I Diagnostics are essential for universal health coverage to succeed.https://www.statnews.com/2019/05/20/diagnostics-universal-health-coverage-succeed/Date accessed: July 24, 2019Google Scholar Acknowledging these concerns, WHO released the first Model List of Essential In Vitro Diagnostics in 2018 and updated the list in 2019. The second essential diagnostics list2WHOSecond WHO Model List of Essential In Vitro Diagnostics.https://www.who.int/medical_devices/publications/Standalone_document_v8.pdf?ua=1Date accessed: July 23, 2019Google Scholar has 122 test categories, including 46 general tests (eg, for haemoglobin, blood glucose, bilirubin) and 69 specific tests (eg, for HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, hepatitis B and C, syphilis, human papillomavirus, leishmaniasis, dengue, zika, and influenza). In addition, the list includes tests for several noncommunicable diseases (eg, cancers, diabetes, and hypothyroidism). Although the essential diagnostics list is rapidly growing, it still has a long way to go before it can adequately support the use of all the drugs included in the essential medicines list.5Schroeder LF Guarner J Amukele TK Essential diagnostics for the use of World Health Organization essential medicines.Clinical chemistry. 2018; 64: 1148-1157Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar The various editions of the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines has been adopted and adapted by more than 150 countries, which have developed their own national lists and used them to improve the access to, and affordability and quality of medicines. We hope countries will do the same with the essential diagnostics list. Another strategy to ensure the availability of essential tests is to have them explicitly defined, costed, and incorporated into global and national UHC intervention packages. The Lancet Commission on diagnostics intends to present a comprehensive, evidence-based, and costed package for diagnostic service delivery that could be adapted by countries for effective UHC.6Wilson ML Atun R DeStigter K et al.The Lancet Commission on diagnostics: advancing equitable access to diagnostics.Lancet. 2019; 393: 2018-2020Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar Innovation along with research and development are crucial for the development and implementation of platform technologies that can deliver a range of essential tests, so that health systems do not need to invest in separate technologies for each test or condition. Innovation is also key for improving service delivery. To take tests close to homes and communities, we need to exploit approaches such as digital applications, home-based sample collection, self-testing, and testing in communities via providers such as lay health workers and pharmacies. Because not all tests can be delivered close to home, countries need to invest in tiered, connected laboratory networks and optimise their use to deliver as many essential tests as possible at the lowest expense to the health system, while maintaining quality. In summary, the time has arrived for health systems to pivot from syndromic management to precision therapy guided by tests. The simultaneous release of both lists by WHO is a welcome development to advance this agenda. All authors were members of the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on In Vitro Diagnostics Group that developed the Essential Diagnostics List. They are also commissioners for the Lancet Commission on diagnostics. MP serves on the scientific advisory committee of the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,102
Tête enseignante GPT0,327
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle