MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2970101771

Ophthalmology in New Zealand: Its development and professionalization

2015· dissertation· en· W2970101771 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · 2015
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedical History and Innovations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProfessionalizationOptometryPolitical scienceOphthalmologyLibrary scienceMedicineLawComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This thesis examines the development and professionalization of ophthalmology in New Zealand/Aotearoa from its first practitioners in the nineteenth century to the twenty-first century. Developments and professionalization in New Zealand are compared to those in overseas countries. The development of ophthalmology in New Zealand started before Europeans arrived. Maori suffered in particular from conjunctivitis and corneal infections, which were treated with extracts from plants, with human milk or urine, and sometimes with fish oils. The first European medical practitioner to record any interest in the eye was Dr David Monro, who arrived in New Zealand in 1842. He recorded seeing corneal ulcers in Maori. Practice in hospitals was the first step in professionalization in New Zealand. Dr Silas Stedman, described as an ophthalmologist, was appointed superintendent of Christchurch Hospital in 1862. By contrast, in 1877 Dr John Wilkins arrived in Christchurch and was one of a group of itinerant practitioners who advertised and travelled around both New Zealand and Australia. Ophthalmology significantly advanced when Dr Henry Lindo Ferguson arrived in Dunedin in 1883, as New Zealand’s first fully trained ophthalmologist, rather than a generalist with an interest in ophthalmology. Further progress was made with the first publication by a New Zealand ophthalmologist, which appeared in the first issue of the New Zealand Medical Journal in 1887. Subsequently, the first meeting of New Zealand ophthalmologists was at the Intercolonial Medical Congress in Melbourne in 1889. Ophthalmology’s first effective medical agents were atropine, pilocarpine, and eserine all of which became available in the late 1800s. Cocaine as a local anaesthetic was first used in 1885. There was no further major medical advance until antibiotics in the 1940s and steroids in the 1950s. These developments continued with the arrival of antivirals in the 1960s. From the 1980s new anti-glaucoma medications and new antibiotics were introduced. The major advance in medical ophthalmology in the present century has been the introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs, commonly known as anti-VEGFs. Ophthalmic surgery in the 1800s was confined to cataract, iridectomy for glaucoma, pterygium surgery, strabismus surgery, and various eyelid and lacrimal procedures. In the 1920s and 30s glaucoma drainage and retinal detachment surgery were developed. Surgery progressed rapidly in the mid-twentieth century, with the first successful corneal transplants in New Zealand in 1949. The introduction of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and ophthalmic sutures in the early 1950s all increased the success rate of surgery. Vitreous surgery was introduced in 1977, intra-ocular lenses in the early 1980s, and laser refractive surgery in the 1990s. Dedicated day-stay ophthalmic surgery centres opened in the 1990s. Ophthalmic medical and surgical advances always followed very soon after their introduction overseas, but none originated in New Zealand. Professor Anthony Molteno of Dunedin was a world pioneer of glaucoma drainage setons, but his original work on these devices was completed before he emigrated from South Africa. Nevertheless, New Zealand ophthalmic practice is of a very high standard, partly because its practitioners have always acknowledged that New Zealand is too small to sustain the specialty without cross-fertilization of ideas and techniques, and so most have frequently travelled overseas to keep up with advances. The practice pattern of New Zealand ophthalmology largely followed that in Britain because many early ophthalmologists emigrated from Britain, many New Zealanders did their postgraduate training in Britain, and during their careers Britain was the usual destination for attachments to keep abreast of developments in the specialty. However, the beginnings of successful surgery for retinal detachment in the 1930s stemmed from pioneering work principally in Europe, rather than Britain. Since the late 1970s, the practice pattern in New Zealand has been increasingly steered by the influence of the United States, in particular with vitreo-retinal surgery, intra-ocular lenses, refractive surgery, and ophthalmic anaesthesia. From 1972 New Zealanders began to complete their general ophthalmology training at home, prior to further ophthalmic sub-specialty training overseas. From the 1970s, New Zealanders began to seek their post-graduate sub-specialty education in the United States and Canada, although the majority still travelled to Britain. From the early 2000s sub-specialty and postgraduate fellowships became available in New Zealand. Professionalization commenced with operations being performed in hospitals, the earliest recorded being in Dunedin Hospital in 1884. The first formal ophthalmology teaching was also in 1884, medical registration was introduced in 1867, the first conference was in 1889, and the first visual standards for occupations were adopted in 1896. The most significant leap in professionalization was the founding of the Ophthalmological Society of New Zealand in 1946. Visiting experts from overseas presented at its annual scientific meetings. The Society’s publication “Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society of New Zealand” was the first medical specialist publication in the country, and gave ophthalmologists an incentive to publish items of interest from their clinical work, and their clinical research. As a representative body, the Society was more effective than individuals in promoting public health initiatives in eye care, and vision standards for occupations. The first academic department of ophthalmology was founded in Dunedin in 1947 at the University of Otago. The medical specialists register commenced in 1971. Professionalization further progressed with the introduction of continuing professional development including clinical audit in the 1990s. In 1997 the Ophthalmological Society of New Zealand amalgamated with the Royal Australian College of Ophthalmologists to form the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists (RANZCO). This gave New Zealand ophthalmologists secure access to the College’s educational programmes, scientific conferences, training programmes, examinations, its qualification, and its continuing professional development programme. Academic ophthalmology became more securely established with the appointment of Professor Charles McGhee as the first professorial head of an academic ophthalmology department in 1999 at the University of Auckland, and Professor Colin Green as Professor of Ophthalmology and Translational Vision Research in 2007. The Department in Auckland has hugely increased the quantity and quality of ophthalmic research in New Zealand, as well as the standard of clinical practice. Compared to other westernized countries, professionalization in New Zealand was behind in the nineteenth century because European settlement commenced only in around 1840, and thereafter the number of ophthalmology practitioners was comparatively few, indeed only nine by the end of the century. However, in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, New Zealand ophthalmology, to its credit, developed largely in parallel with Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Contemporary New Zealand ophthalmology has evolved over two centuries to become a profession largely independent of major external influence and is a fully mature sub-specialty. It now encompasses training to specialist level, with post-graduate sub-specialty fellowships and university academic departments which engage ophthalmologists and scientists in ophthalmic basic science and clinical research. Thus New Zealand has significantly contributed in recent decades to the global knowledge base of ophthalmology and visual sciences and has become a provider, as well as a recipient, of advanced, international, clinical and research training opportunities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,815
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,099
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearchSpace (University of Auckland)Même sujetMedical History and InnovationsTravaux en français237 207