Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Physics Today news story “Iranian scientists persevere under renewed sanctions” by Toni Feder (January 2019, page 22) blames the US embargo for hardships that Iranian scientists encounter as they pursue international collaborations. Only two sentences in the four-page report mention Iran’s recent actions against numerous scientists in the country who have Western connections, and no mention is made of the long prison terms or death sentences they have received “for collaborating with a hostile government.”Omid Kokabee, a physics doctoral student at the University of Texas at Austin, was sentenced to 10 years on a “collaboration” charge and spent 2011–16 in an Iranian prison; he was released only after he developed kidney cancer (see “Physicist imprisoned in Iran is granted medical furlough after surgery,” Physics Today online, 25 May 2016). Ahmadreza Djalali, a Swedish resident and a principal investigator on two European research projects in disaster medicine, was arrested in 2016 after he was invited to a scientific workshop in Tehran. In 2017 he was sentenced to death for his refusal to spy for Iran’s military.11. E. Chudnovsky, “He refused to spy for Iran’s military, and was sentenced to death for it,” Washington Examiner, 2 November 2017.Xiyue Wang, a doctoral student in history at Princeton University, was sentenced in 2017 to 10 years in prison when his studies of ancient documents in Tehran were interpreted as espionage.22. R. Gladstone, “Colleagues of Princeton University scholar convicted of spying in Iran express shock,” New York Times, 17 July 2017. Meimanat Hosseini-Chavoshi, an Australian citizen and fertility expert, was detained on her research trip to Iran last December on charges of trying to “infiltrate” Iranian institutions.33. Dubai newsroom, G. Elgood, ed., “Iran said to hold Australian-based academic on ‘infiltration’ charge,” Reuters World News, 9 December 2018.In 2018 several Iranian environmental scientists were rounded up on suspicion that their studies of wildlife might have revealed information about Iranian military sites. One of them, Kavous Seyed-Emami, a Canadian citizen and professor at Imam Sadiq University in Tehran, died in prison after intense interrogations.44. E. Chudnovsky, “Iran’s Revolutionary Guards rain down terror upon scientists suspected of contacts with the West,” Washington Examiner, 11 April 2019. Four others have been accused of “sowing corruption on Earth,” a charge that can carry a death sentence.The above-mentioned cases represent the tip of the iceberg. Anyone who has dual citizenship or is a doctoral student residing or studying in another country is taking serious chances when returning to Iran for a professional or family visit. Although the US sanctions contribute to the hardships experienced by our Iranian colleagues, the actions of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps are largely responsible for making the lives of the Iranian scientists miserable.ReferencesSection:ChooseTop of pageReferences <<1. E. Chudnovsky, “He refused to spy for Iran’s military, and was sentenced to death for it,” Washington Examiner, 2 November 2017. Google Scholar2. R. Gladstone, “Colleagues of Princeton University scholar convicted of spying in Iran express shock,” New York Times, 17 July 2017. Google Scholar3. Dubai newsroom, G. Elgood, ed., “Iran said to hold Australian-based academic on ‘infiltration’ charge,” Reuters World News, 9 December 2018. Google Scholar4. E. Chudnovsky, “Iran’s Revolutionary Guards rain down terror upon scientists suspected of contacts with the West,” Washington Examiner, 11 April 2019. Google Scholar© 2019 American Institute of Physics.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».