The pulse of recent research on school-based physical activity and wellness
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The pulse of recent research on school-based physical activity and wellness School is an ideal setting in which to reach and impact children and adolescents in order to improve their health and wellness.A large number of scholarly articles have been published on the subject of school-based physical activity (PA) and wellness promotion.However, given the diversity of schools worldwide, intervention programs, curricula, and strategies are not "one size fits all" and may not be universally applicable.The inconsistent application of theoretical frameworks and various measurement methods further muddles the evidence.One problem with many school-based PA and wellness interventions is their prospect for generalization and sustainability.In recent years, many researchers have turned attention to devising interventions, including school-based interventions targeting children and adolescents, to reduce health-compromising sedentary behavior, as well as to promote health-enhancing PA.Additional evidence-and stronger evidence than currently available-is needed to shed light on how these interventions can and should be scaled up, implemented, disseminated, and adopted more broadly in schools and populations.In this special topic of the Journal of Sport and Health Science (JSHS), we present 5 invited papers contributed by 4 world-renowned research groups to capture the pulse of the latest research on school-based PA and wellness.The 5 papers are all empirical studies, including 4 original first-hand studies and 1 systematic review with meta-analysis.The types of research conducted in these studies range from natural experiment and mixed-methods process evaluation to qualitative research, survey, and review.All 5 papers are based on recent competitively funded research projects carried out in schools.These research investigations were guided by implementation science and robust theoretical frameworks such as the socioecologic model and the theory of enhanced, extended, and expanded opportunity (TEO). 1 Last, these 5 studies represent mainly the Western perspective (i.e., USA, UK, and Norway) on school-based PA promotion and sedentary behavior mitigation, although Jones et al.'s systematic review and meta-analysis also summarizes findings from studies that took place in Canada; European Union countries; Hong Kong, China; Iceland; and Switzerland.Below, we present a synopsis of these 5 articles and encourage readers to refer to the full-text articles for more details.Jones and colleagues feature a multi-institutional collaboration for a systematic review with meta-analysis of school-based interventions to promote PA and/or reduce sedentary behavior in children aged 5À11 years of age.Guided by the TEO as the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,028 | 0,096 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,012 | 0,016 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».