So you think you laser safety program is going well, are you really sure?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As with all safety issues it is easy, forget that laser hazards do not stop at one place or at one use; after all we have a program in place to cover those hazards, right. Well maybe not, the traditional laser safety program generally focuses on three groups’ research, medical and industrial users of lasers. Why? Because they are the most likely to obtain and use class 3B and 4 lasers, as these lasers where expensive to purchase and often required special utilities to operate. Unfortunately, this is no longer the case, with the availability of cheap and very powerful lasers, the laser safety officer (LSO) needs to expand their horizon’s to include non-traditional groups in the laser safety program. The LSO should expand their reach into these areas, facilities use, embedded laser use, outdoor laser use, and of course the driver behind all of this the cheap laser. When one thinks of facilities laser use, what first comes to mind are laser levels and laser sighted infrared thermometers which are generally safe when purchased from reliable manufactures, but what about laser wielding or laser paint removal, have you consider the impact these tools will have on your laser safety program? On the other hand embedded laser have been only a concern when they are disposed of after all they are in a Class 1 box with interlocks so little concern, right? Well maybe not, interlocks can fail, be defeated or not be there at all. After all the embedded will be used by researchers or trades professionals who read the manual and understand about the hazards. Look at where all those embedded lasers are going, maker spaces, libraries, or general office spaces and ask are you reaching these folks? If those areas are not enough places to look consider the great outdoors, but you say the only folks who would use a laser outdoors are researchers or concert promoters and they know that there are very specific rules to follow because we put all of that into the laser safety manual, but ask who is reading it? Did you ask your pest management group what happened to all the Canadian geese on campus, or the folks wanting to collect plant samples in the top of trees, or the group of makers who thought making a laser canon would be fun for playing tag? So what is causing this expansion of laser use? The cheap laser, do you realize that you can now purchase a 100W laser for less than $5,000.00 correction $1,000.00! Most institutions and companies will require purchase at or over $5,000.00 to be reviewed prior to authorization, but if the cost is less, there may be little or no oversite. Therefore, even if you have purchasing flagging lasers in all likelihood you will never see this kind of powerful laser buy thus you must expand your horizons to close this hole in your program.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».