Notice bibliographique
Résumé
SCOTT'S musical output is substantial, and allows for a diachronic study of his musical style to be undertaken through his output in at least four media: piano music, chamber works, orchestral works and songs. Of these, he had the most abiding interest in writing for the piano, and for a variety of chamber combinations. These media represent all periods of his creative life, and provide the best glimpse of his stylistic attributes as they transformed from period to period. Accordingly, here we shall survey Scott's piano output in a roughly chronological order. As with many other long-lived composers of the earlier twentieth century, Scott's music exhibits a wide variety of compositional approaches, and the internal evidence of the music itself is often a fair guide as to when a composition might have been written. One is perhaps initially struck by how different the works preceding World War 1 are from those of the inter-war years, and from those of his later life. The stylistic changes, however, do not equate simply to the passing of time; indeed, some aspects of Scott's musical style remained with him for life, largely unaltered by external forces. Foremost among these is his sense of lyricism, instilled in him by his musical training in youth. This aspect of his writing remains Romantic at its core, in much the same sense as it does with the Second Viennese School, even as his harmonic language transformed radically over the years. Scott's earliest systematic training at the piano was with the Italian pianist Lazzaro Uzielli at the Hoch'sche Conservatorium in Frankfurt (1891–3), and upon his return to Liverpool with Herman Steudner-Welsing, a Viennese musician living there at the time. He [Steudner-Welsing] had two deplorable habits; he jammed down the pedal and would often forget to release it, and further he snorted violently all the time he performed … One was not always quite sure of getting one's lesson, for the poor little man suffered from an inordinate craving for spirits … Fortunately for me he taught me none of his bad habits but only some useful ones. Scott's early studies in theory, during the first Frankfurt period and with no less a figure than Humperdinck, were sadly unstimulating (‘Of how to teach he had no conception at all”).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».