MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2974605788 · doi:10.1353/hcy.2019.0048

Guiding Modern Girls: Girlhood, Empire, and Internationalism in the 1920s and 1930s by Kristine Alexander, and: Our Frontier is the World: The Boy Scouts in the Age of American Ascendancy by Mischa Honeck

2019· article· en· W2974605788 sur OpenAlex
Susan A. Miller

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youth · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAsian American and Pacific Histories
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBoy ScoutsFrontierGirlEmpireMilitarismInternationalism (politics)AllegianceMillerHistoryEnthusiasmSociologyArt historyGender studiesPoliticsLawAncient historyPolitical sciencePsychologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Guiding Modern Girls: Girlhood, Empire, and Internationalism in the 1920s and 1930s by Kristine Alexander, and: Our Frontier is the World: The Boy Scouts in the Age of American Ascendancy by Mischa Honeck Susan A. Miller Guiding Modern Girls: Girlhood, Empire, and Internationalism in the 1920s and 1930s. By Kristine Alexander. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2017. ix + 283 pp. Cloth $85, paper and e-book $34.95. Our Frontier is the World: The Boy Scouts in the Age of American Ascendancy. By Mischa Honeck. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018. xvi + 374 pp. Cloth $39.95. Historians of twentieth-century youth organizations have long struggled to untangle the overlapping, and often contradictory, layers of meaning ascribed to organizations by their members. Organization founders, and the professional youth workers who took over from them, tried to apply up-to-date, child-centered pedagogy even as they cast a wary eye at modern youth cultures. Enthusiastic parents—and those who were reluctantly commandeered—came equipped with wilderness skills and concerns about implicit militarism. Children joined with expectations that ranged from starry-eyed enthusiasm to bored compliance. Scholars have tugged at all of these threads in an effort to weave complex histories of the organizations—Boy and Girl Scouts, 4-H Clubs, Camp Fire and Girl Guides—that commanded the allegiance of millions of adults and children across North America and western Europe in the twentieth century. In the past few years, however, historians of youth have begun to insist on another dimension of analysis, the transnational. This work, ably begun by Jennifer Helgren's American Girls and Global Responsibility and Gabriel Rosenberg's The 4-H Harvest: Sexuality and the State in Rural America, is furthered by the two excellent texts under review. [End Page 493] Kristine Alexander uses histories of Girl Guides from Britain, Canada, and India to explore how the creation of modern girlhood was inextricably bound up in the imperial and nationalist projects that shaped the interwar years. Mischa Honeck, preferring "the lens of the imperial" to the transnational, argues that the Boys Scouts of America set its members loose on a world that was troubled by US expansionist desire, especially when it came thinly veiled with a mask of boyish innocence (5). For both authors, the geopolitics of empire and nation are fundamental to the establishment, growth, and popularity of youth organizations. An obsessive, modern fascination with young people, paired with a concomitant plasticity of the meaning of youth, rendered boys and girls useful partners in what Honeck calls the "rejuvenation" of empire. For Alexander and Honeck, Guides and Scouts, representatives of allegedly "non-political" organizations, perform the work of empire wherever they go. Together these texts lay the foundation for a historiography of youth organizations that places a critical analysis of the international alongside national and local stories. Alexander chooses to engage the transnational dimension of Girl Guiding by interweaving profiles of organizations in Canada, England, and India. As she rightly points out, the leaders of Girl Guiding and Scouting were immensely—and often naively—proud that their organizations achieved popularity around the globe. Leaders exhorted Guides "'to get to know their own country' and celebrate 'the glory of [their] heritage'" even as they reified an essentialist understanding of global sisterhood that assumed an inherent commonality among young women (127). Alexander sets herself an ambitious task in Guiding Modern Girls—not only to develop and explicate three far-flung examples of Girl Guiding, but to reject the case study approach and instead view British, Canadian, and Indian Girl Guiding as equal nodes of transmission in a dynamic exchange of ideas that work together to create an international program. She adroitly employs Guides from the metropole, a settler society, and a colony to highlight the tensions and contradictions embedded in Guide leaders' assumptions about cultural and racial hierarchies as well as gender roles. Although she is sensitive to the racist provincialism that often imbued the organization, Alexander never allows Guiding's imperial birthright to overwhelm her story. In insisting on girls' ability to adapt the Guide program to their own ends, she creates space for an agentic, even subversive, understanding of the girls and women...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,222
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,910

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle