Culture Condition for High Biomass Production of Probiotic Yeast Saccharomyces Boulardii SB2 in Shake Flask and 30 Littre Scale
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Probiotic properties in vitroof the Saccharomyces boulardii SB2 yeast, was isolated from fruit at Cuc Phuong National Park were evaluated based on biological characteristics and tolerance in simulated intestinal conditions. In the present work, studies were carried out to improve cell growth kinetics to produce cell mass of this biotherapeutic yeast in shake flaskand 30-L bioreactor levels. In case of shake flask, the highest biomass was obtained under the culture conditions as YM medium, at 37oC, pH 6, inoculum concentration of 5 %, with shaking for 32 h; the best sources of carbon and nitrogen were found to be glucose and mixture of peptone, yeast extract, malt extract; cell dry weight and cell density reached 2.43 g L-1 and 109 CFU/ml repetitively. During 30-L bioreactor cultivation, the maximal cell mass in agitation speed of 200 rpm, aeration rate of 1.2 v v-1 min-1; at 32 h of incubation, was 3.58 g L-1 in pH controlled culture and 3.08 g L-1 in uncontrolled pH. This is considered as the first step for cell mass production of this probiotic yeast in industrial scale
 Keywords:
 Saccharomyces boulardii SB2, probiotic, biomass, shake flask, 30-L bioreactor.
 References
 [1] FAO/WHO, Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food, Joint FAO/WHO Working Group Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food London, Ontario, Canada, April 30 and May 1, 2002.[2] J. Park, M.H. Floch, Prebiotics, probiotics, and dietary fiber in gastrointestinal disease, Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, 36 (2007) 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2007. 03.001. [3] F. Mansour-Ghanaei, N. Dehbashi, K. Yazdanparast, A Shafaghi, Efficacy of Saccharomyces boulardii with antibiotics in acute amoebiasis, World Journal of Gastroenterology, 9(2003)1832-1833. https:// dx.doi.org/10.3748/ wjg.v9.i8.1832.[4] I. Castagliuolo, M.F. Riegler, L. Valenick, J.T. LaMont, C. Pothoulakis, Saccharomyces boulardii protease inhibits the effects of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in human colonic mucosa, Infection and Immunity, 67, 1(1999)302-307. [5] A. Qamar, S. Aboudola, M. Warny, P. Michetti, C. Pothoulakis, J.T. LaMont, C.P. Kelly, Saccharomyces boulardii stimulates intestinal immunoglobulin A immune response to Clostridium difficile toxin A in mice, Infection and Immunity, 69 (2001) 2762-2765. https:// doi.org/10.1128/IAI.69.4.2762-2765.2001.[6] T.S. Chin, N.Z. Othman, R. A. Malek, N. Elmarzugi, O. M. Leng, S. Ramli, N. F. Musa, R. Aziz and H. El Enshasy, Bioprocess optimization for biomass production of probiotics yeast Saccharomyces boulardii in semi-industrial scale, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 7, 3(2015)122-132. [7] D.T.N. Diep, P. George, E. Gorczyca, S. Kasapis, Studies on the viability of Saccharomyces boulardii within microcapsules in relation to the thermomechanical properties of wheyprotein. Food Hydrocolloids, 42 (2014) 232-238. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.024.[8] G.L. Miller, Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31 (1959) 426-428 https://doi.org/ 10.1021/ac60147a030.[9] H. A. El-Enshasy and A. A. El-Shereef, Optimization of high cell density cultivation of (Probiotic/Biotherapeutic) yeast Saccharomyces boulardii adapted to dryness stress, Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 104,93(2008)89-394.[10] K. Rajkowska, A. K.-S. Bska and A. Rygala, Probiotic activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var.boulardii against human pathogens, Food Technology and Biotechnology, 50, 2 (2012) 230–236. [11] R. Zbinden, E.E. Gonczi, M. Altwegg, Inhibition of Saccharomyces boulardii (nom. inval.) on cell invasion of Salmonella typhimurium and Yersinia enterocolitica, Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 11(1999)158–162. https://doi.org/10. 1080/089106099435736.[12] D. Czerucka, T. Piche, P. Rampal, Review article: Yeasts as probiotics – Saccharomyces boulardii, Alimentary Pharmacology Therapeutics, 26(2007)767–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365 -2036.2007.03442.x.[13] L.V. Mc Farland, P. Bernacoscani, Saccharomyces boulardii. A Review of an Innovative Biotherapeutic Agent, Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 6(1993)157-171. https://doi. org/10.3109/08910609309141323.[14] K. Rajkowska and A. Kunicka-Styczynska, Probiotic properties of yeasts isolated from chicken feces and kefirs, Polish Journal of Microbiology, 59,4(2010) 257-263.[15] J.L.R. Fietto R.S. Araujo and F.N. Valadao, Molecular and physiological comparisons between Saccharomy cescerevisiae and Saccharomyces boulardii, Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 50 (2004) 615–621. https://doi. org/10.1139/w04-050.[16] J.L. Muller, K.L. Protti, M.S. Machado, L.L.V. Lacerda, T.M.B. Bresolin, P.S. Podlech, Comparison of Saccharomyces boulardii growth in an air-lift fermentor and in a shaker, Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 27,4(2007)688-693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-206120070004 00003.
 
 
 
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».