The Asian Forum for Polar Sciences: fostering Asian co-operation in Antarctica
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the past years, Asian countries have been in the spotlight of academics and politics for various reason.Terms such as 'orientalism', 'the Asian century', and lately 'polar orientalism' have been used by many scholars to express the Asian participation in worldwide activities.'Polar orientalism' expresses the fear that countries have towards the relation between East Asian countries and their interest on polar regions.Since the Heroic Age of Antarctic explorations, Asian countries have been involved in activities in the area below 60° S latitude.Japan was also one of the twelve original signatories of the Antarctic Treaty.Since 2004, Asian countries operating in Antarctica have been organised in a regional group: the Asian Forum for Polar Sciences (AFoPS).AFoPS aims to foster co-operative scientific and logistic projects within Asian countries, to serve as a forum to encourage more Asian countries to be involved in polar activities and to communicate Asian achievements to the wider polar community.This thesis discusses the achievements obtained by AFoPS in the Antarctic community and how AFoPS, as a regional group, is positioning itself from a policy making and knowledge outcomes point of view.Additionally, also the Asian presence in Antarctica has been assessed and the level of sharing of infrastructures has been evaluated.The research has been conducted using both qualitative and quantitative approaches through interviews, bibliometric analysis and sourcing relevant documents.AFoPS, through the establishment of five action groups that were in operation for the first twelve years of life of this forum, fostered scientific co-operative activities in the Asian polar community.The outcomes of the research conducted under the AFoPS umbrella indicate an increase of coauthored peer-reviewed works.The results show that countries with a strong polar background are the one that are mainly publishing cox authored papers, and here especially researchers affiliated with institutions in the Republic of Korea.Countries that more recently began to engage in Antarctic research are enhancing their expertise co-operating with more established players.Thailand, for example, is a country that is gaining awareness on Antarctic issues through co-operation within AFoPS.In fact, AFoPS Members that already have a polar program and infrastructures in Antarctica, are sharing their facilities with AFoPS Members and Observers that currently do not have the capability to establish their own Antarctic programmes.In doing that, AFoPS aims to encourage more Asian countries to be actively involved in Antarctic research to increase, through cooperative projects, our understanding about teleconnections, or how the Antarctic interacts with the rest of the globe.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,028 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,019 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».