MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2975900312 · doi:10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.1861.1861

A Phase Ib/II Trial of Selinexor Combined with Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed / Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2017· article· en· W2975900312 sur OpenAlexaff
Darrell White, Nizar J. Bahlis, Christopher P. Venner, Gary J. Schiller, Cristina Gasparetto, Heather J. Sutherland, Michaël Sébag, Suzanne Lentzsch, Rami Kotb, William Bensinger, Brea Lipe, Christine I. Chen, Aldo Del Col, Michael Kauffman, Sharon Shacham, Jacqueline Jeha, Jean‐Richard Saint‐Martin, Jatin J. Shah, Richard LeBlanc

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueNuclear Structure and Function
Établissements canadiensHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreDalhousie UniversityRoyal Victoria HospitalUniversity of TorontoCancerCare ManitobaVancouver General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLenalidomideTolerabilityNeutropeniaMedicineRegimenDexamethasoneInternal medicineMultiple myelomaFebrile neutropeniaOncologyPhases of clinical researchPomalidomideRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologyPharmacologyAdverse effectClinical trialToxicityBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction - The nuclear export protein exportin 1 (XPO1) is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including multiple myeloma (MM). Selinexor is a first-in-class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates XPO1. Selinexor forces nuclear retention and reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs; IkB, p53 and FOXO) and reduction of many proto-oncogenes, including MDM2, MYC and Cyclin D. The combination of lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) is an approved regimen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 70-76% and a low complete response rate. In combination with selinexor, the anticipated overlapping toxicities are fatigue, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. We hypothesized that selinexor could be safely combined with Rd and improve efficacy. Methods - The objective of this phase 1b/2 dose escalation study (NCT02343042) was to determine the tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of selinexor, lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (SRd) in RRMM. Patients (pts) with RRMM who received ≥ 1 prior therapy were enrolled. Selinexor was dosed escalated in two regimens once-weekly (QW) or twice weekly (BIW) with both dosing cohorts starting at 60 mg, len 25 mg PO daily and dexamethasone (dex) 20 mg BIW or 40 mg QW. Results - As of 15-Jul-2017, 18 pts (13 male / 5 female) were enrolled. The median age was 68 years and pts received a median of 1 (range, 1 - 7) prior treatment regimen. Thrombocytopenia was the most common side effect with 4 associated DLTs (2 pts each in the 60 mg BIW and 80 QW cohorts). One additional DLT of grade 3 anorexia was observed in the 60 mg BIW cohort. Common treatment-related grade 1/2 adverse events (AEs) included: nausea (67%), anorexia (44%), fatigue (28%), vomiting (28%), and constipation (28%). Grade 3/4 AEs include: thrombocytopenia (56%), neutropenia (39%), fatigue (11%) and anemia (6%). No DLTs were observed with selinexor 60 mg QW and long-term tolerability was observed. Fifteen pts were evaluable for response, of which 11 pts responded for an ORR of 73%. Among the len naive pts (n=11), an ORR of 91% was seen, including 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 7 partial responses (PR, 2 unconfirmed) and 1 unconfirmed minor response (MR). Of the len refractory/relapsed pts (n=4), there was 1 unconfirmed PR, 1 MR, and 2 stable disease (SD). Median PFS was 6.6 months with a median follow up of 4 months. Based on tolerability and anti-MM activity the RP2D of SRd is selinexor 60 mg QW, len 25 mg qd and dex 40 mg QW. Conclusions - The all oral combination of SRd has significant clinical activity in pts with MM. Importantly, in len naive pts, the ORR was 91%. No new or unexpected toxicities were observed. The combination has no thrombotic, cardiac, pulmonary, liver or renal toxicity. The main DLT was thrombocytopenia. This phase 1 trial demonstrated that selinexor be can safely combined with Rd in RRMM with high ORR in len naive pts. These results support the further studies in both newly diagnosed MM as well as in RRMM. Disclosures Bahlis: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gasparetto: Janssen, BMS, Celgene, Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen, BMS, Celgene: Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed; Janssen, BMS, Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Sebag: Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy. Lentzsch: BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Caelum Biosciences: Other: leadership position and stock. Bensinger: Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Chen: Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kauffman: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shacham: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jeha: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Saint-Martin: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Shah: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,314
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,352

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetNuclear Structure and FunctionTravaux en français237 207