Discrimination against women in workplaces: Present scenario of Bangladesh in comparison to Canada.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Discrimination against women and girls often extends beyond societal norms and practices and enshrined in policies and laws. True gender equality and lasting empowerment of women and girls will not be possible until women have full and equal protection under the law. However, Canada as a self-proclaimed “Feminist country” first launch “feminist international assistance policy in 2019” in the world. Carrying the legacy, later arranged “Women Deliver” conference on 5th May 2019. Once the poverty eradication movement was initiated by Bangladeshi Nobel Laureate Prof. Yunus involving women from grass root level for their empowerment, reflected twice, in the aforesaid policy of Canada in 2019, when it spread its wings involving its development partners including Bangladesh. . In this article, we have taken a small initiative to compare Canadian anti-discriminatory laws and social mechanism which might help Bangladesh, to get rid of gender-based discrimination. At the same time, this article would be an effort to cross check, whether the ‘law’ itself or the ‘social mechanism’ would be more effective to overcome this problem as the directives of the judges of Bangladesh apex court opined the same. It is undeniable that still the women in Bangladesh are suffering from discrimination indoor to outdoor, from home to workplace, so it becomes essential to provide relief for them. Low paid female garment workers to upper level management workers are suffering from hidden or exposed discrimination. whereas providing strong support, Constitution of Bangladesh recognized female’s equal opportunity among genders. The relief giving process in Bangladesh, officially began with a Supreme Court writ petition 5916 of 2008, as no direct law was available defending the rights of women. Again, In the same writ petition, Court had given a description of “sexual harassment” and concurrently declared it as “discriminatory”, when a female object, because it hampers her work. Similarly, the Canadian Human rights commission declares the “harassment” is a ‘form of discrimination . According to them, all kinds of harassment regarding ‘’sexual, behavioral or pay inequality’’ comes under the term of “discrimination”. However, In the aforesaid writ petition, Bangladesh supreme Court directed to find out an alternative mechanism to cater the need, in absence of legislative provision. Bangladesh Supreme court deliver the judgment, based on some decisions of Canadian supreme court. Therefore, it is worthy to cross check the necessity of enactment “workplace anti-discriminatory” laws for Bangladesh in context of Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».