Geographic Availability of Assistance Dogs: Dogs Placed in 2013–2014 by ADI- or IGDF-Accredited or Candidate Facilities in the United States and Canada, and Non-accredited U.S. Facilities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Assistance dogs’ roles have diversified to support people with various disabilities, especially in the U.S. Data presented here are from the U.S. and Canada non-profit member and candidate facilities of Assistance Dogs International (ADI) and the International Guide Dog Federation (IGDF), and from non-accredited U.S. assistance dog training facilities, on the numbers and types of dogs they placed in 2013 and 2014 with persons who have disabilities. ADI categories of assistance dogs are for guide, hearing, and service (including mobility, autism, psychiatric, diabetes, seizure) dogs. Accredited facilities in 22 states and 3 provinces responded; other accredited facilities in 22 states and 1 province (sometimes in the same states/provinces as accredited facilities) did not respond. Non-accredited facilities in 16 states responded. Results from 55 U.S./Canada responding accredited facilities show placements of 2,374 dogs; results from 22 non-accredited U.S. facilities show 797 placements. Accredited facilities placed similar numbers of dogs for guiding (n = 918) or mobility (n = 943). Mobility dogs were placed by more U.S./Canada facilities than were guide dogs; some of these facilities placed more dogs for autism or another role than for mobility. Autism dogs were third most for accredited (n = 205) and U.S. non-accredited (n = 72) facilities. Psychiatric dogs were fourth most common in accredited placements (n = 119), accounting for most placements (n = 526) in non-accredited facilities. Other U.S./Canada accredited placements were for: hearing (n=109); diabetic alert (n=69), and seizure alert (n=11). Responding non-accredited facilities placed 17 hearing dogs, 30 diabetic alert dogs, and 18 seizure alert/response dogs. Mainly non-accredited facilities placed dogs for psychiatric assistance, but veterans then are disqualified for financial reimbursement. Autism dogs were increasingly being placed even by accredited organizations. Twenty states and several provinces had no responding facilities; 17 of these states had no accredited facilities. In regions lacking facilities, people with disabilities face particular geographic challenges, living far from any supportive facility. Despite accelerated U.S./Canada placements, availability of well-trained assistance dogs continues to be challenging and inconvenient for many people with disabilities, and the numerous sources of expensive, poorly trained dogs can add confusion for potential handlers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».