The Correlation Between a Fecal Calprotectin and a a Clinical Index for Disease Activity for Crohnʼs Disease: A Prospective Cohort
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: The optimal way to follow a patient with Crohn's disease in routine clinical care is unknown as routine endoscopy for mucosal healing is not practical. Current approaches include clinical scoring systems for Crohn's Disease activity, such as the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI). Alternatively fecal calprotectin (FC) has been shown to correlate closely with endoscopic disease activity. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between FC, and HBI. These values were subsequently compared to disease activity as reported on CT enterography (CTE). Methods: A total of 103 patients were recruited from the ambulatory setting at St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC for a CTE evaluating Crohn's disease activity, between September 2012 and September 2014. They were enrolled in a larger study evaluating FC and disease activity evident on CTE. The inclusion criteria were: 1) patients were older than 19. 2) with a confirmed diagnosis of Crohn's disease, and 3) both HBI and FC data were avialable from the same office visit. Demographics, historic data, FC, HBI, and CTE findings were collected prospectively for further analysis. Results: Of 103 patients, 46% were male with average age of 43.6 +/- 15.7 years. Using a Spearman's correlation coefficient graph, no significant correlation was found between HBI and FC levels (rs = - 0.070 (p = 0.484, .95 CI, -0.2664, 0.1319)). Average HBI was 4.4 +/- 4.5 for active disease and 5.3 +/- 4.9 for inactive diasease, showing a statistically non-significant difference between the 2 groups (p=0.28). Average FC was 556 +/- 596.8 for νg/g for active disease and 181.6 +/- 222.3 for inactive disease (p=0.001). In order to assess the validity of FC against CTE findings, any value greater than 150 νg/g was considered to represent active disease. Using this cutoff, FC had a sensitivty of 0.61, specificty of 0.79, PPV of 0.76, and a NPV of 0.62 for detecting active disease, as defined by CTE. Conclusion: In this prospective study of patients with Crohn's disease, no significant correlation was found between FC, an objective biomarker of disease activity, and a clinical index of disease activity, HBI, as evident by cross-referencing them with the findings of CT enterography. Although questionnaires such as HBI may not be completely reliable to assess Crohn's disease acitivity, further research is needed to confirm the utility of FC as a more objective measure of Crohn's disease activity than indices such as HBI.Figure 1Figure 2
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».