P45 Treat the arthritis, not just the chest
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Very little literature exists in supporting the assessment and management of cystic fibrosis related arthritis (CFA) particularly in paediatric and adolescent cases. Methods A 12 year-old male with cystic fibrosis (CF) was admitted via A&E with severe joint pain that was thought to be associated with a respiratory infection and was treated accordingly. Repeated exacerbations of joint disease occurred every 1-2 months, lasting approximately 1 week with significant joint pain, stiffness, and reduced function. The patient did not feel his exacerbations of CFA were related to his respiratory symptoms, admitting he under reported arthritis symptoms to avoid being admitted for IV antibiotics. Initial rheumatology review resulted in treatment with IV antibiotics and piroxicam. Flares continued, prompting his CF physiotherapist and multidisciplinary team to seek further specialist review for his now longstanding symptoms. He scored 16 out of 50 on the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) with a visual analogue score (VAS) of 46 out of 100. At 16 years old he was seen by an MSK physiotherapy and rheumatology team working within a wider CF team. He had a 4 year history of symmetrical joint pain affecting knees, wrists and hands, on a background of bronchiectasis with previous non-tuberculous mycobacteria infection, cystic fibrosis related diabetes, and poor nutrition. He reported some episodes being so bad he was unable to get out of bed, and struggling with the stairs at college. He had 6 swollen and 8 tender joints including wrists, MCPs and knees. Ultrasound imaging of the wrists and hands showed confirmed active synovitis with grade 3 greyscale changes and grade 2 power Doppler. Hydroxychloroquine was commenced with naproxen as required, and wrist splints were provided. Results At follow-up he reported significant symptomatic improvement with occasional minor stiffness in wrists and knees which responded quickly to naproxen and was no longer limiting his activities. Repeat ultrasound confirmed improvement with no active power Doppler, but some ongoing grade 1 greyscale changes and a small wrist effusion. He has returned to previous function with an MPQ score of 0, and VAS of 10 out of 100. He reported improved quality of life due to reduced pain and fewer, shorter, and more manageable exacerbations. Conclusion Specialist review and commencement on disease modifying anti-rheumatic medication helped to manage CFA in this case. All cases of suspected CFA should be referred for specialist rheumatology opinion. CF physiotherapists are in an excellent position to identify cases and empowering the multidisciplinary team has been vital in this case. Further trials are required to investigate optimal management of CFA, but it seems likely that directly addressing the arthritis with disease modifying therapy may play an important role. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,049 | 0,022 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».