Self-selection, location, and entrepreneurship: British self-employment in North America in the early 20th century
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"The decision to undertake international migration has long interested economics and economic historians alike. Labour economists have placed considerable emphasis to the nature of self-selection among immigrants: under what conditions do individuals with high or low levels of skill choose to relocate across borders? Economic theory has been used to relate immigrant self-selection to relative economic conditions between source and destination regions, with the relative dispersion of earnings in the two areas thought to be a key determinant of immigrant selection (Borjas, 1987). This theoretical perspective can be extended to consider the choices made by immigrants from a single source country among a wider set of potential destination markets. While labour economists have examined immigrant selectivity in contemporary labour markets, the early twentieth century offers a better testing ground for this theory. As flows between Europe and North America were largely unregulated prior to 1917, we can observe how immigrants self-select across a set of labour markets in the absence of rigid immigrant policies and other constraints. Can differences in economic conditions lead destination countries to receive immigrants from the same source but with very different abilities in the labour market? Scholars of nineteenth century North America have asked this very question with reference to British immigration. Some observers of British immigration claimed that, due to the limited range of labour market opportunities in Canada, Britons choosing to reside in this country were considerably less able than those who chose to move to the United States. Recent work by Green, MacKinnon, and Minns (2002) finds that the economic characteristics of British immigrants in both countries were broadly similar circa 1900, but self-selection may lead to immigrant populations with important differences in unmeasured characteristics, such as schooling or innate ability. In this paper, we search for evidence of differences in immigrant self-selection across destination choices through an assessment of self-employment among British immigrants in Canada and the United States in the early twentieth century. We examine self-employment because it is one of the few indicators of labour market status available in both Canadian and American Census data from the early twentieth century, and one that is associated with high levels of human capital (Minns and Rizov, 2003). We use the United States Census of 1910 and the Census of Canada of 1901 to estimate the determinants of self-employment in both countries. Our results will provide important evidence on possible differences in immigrant self-selection between the two labour markets: in either the United States or Canada, were British immigrants better endowed with the characteristics associated with successful entrepreneurship, or more likely to become self-employed entrepreneurs, conditional on observable characteristics?"
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».