MétaCan
Menu

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEmergency Medicine News · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWonderEmergency departmentTheme (computing)Health careMedical diagnosisPsychologyMedicinePolitical sciencePsychiatryLawSocial psychologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

emergency medicine, uncertainty: emergency medicine, uncertaintyUncertainty is the driving force of the emergency department—it drives frightened patients to the ED to seek help and makes emergency physicians seek answers to puzzling diagnoses. Yet, payers and governments are hesitant to accept the reality of this uncertainty because the search for solutions can increase health care costs. A measurement of uncertainty called the U-Scale, under development by researchers at the Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, may give emergency physicians and payers important clues about why patients come to the ED, go home unsure about their health status, and then return to the ED. Kristin Rising, MD, the director of acute care transition and an associate professor of emergency medicine at Jefferson, has focused her work on the patients' perspective about their needs when they returned to the emergency department. “The primary theme that has come up has been this ongoing fear and uncertainty that patients experience related to having symptoms,” she said. “It's scary and uncomfortable for many, and they don't know what they indicate. Do I have a new horrible disease and I'm going to die tomorrow? They don't know how to treat the symptoms or what they mean.” Dr. Rising said patients wonder why they have symptoms, so they come to a place where they can get answers, and this has been an underappreciated problem. “We need some way to tangibly measure this, and down the line measure their uncertainties better,” she said. Samuel G. Campbell, MB, BCh, a professor of emergency medicine at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, said uncertainty is not limited to patients. Emergency physicians are often called upon to make decisions about patients based on inadequate knowledge, like one case where the “perfect storm” of uncertainty deferred the diagnosis for 24 hours of a diabetic patient on dialysis who suffered a seizure. (Acad Emerg Med 2007;14[8]:743; http://bit.ly/2JOXqrE.) The day after the seizure, the patient was seen by two emergency physicians, a cardiologist, and a neurologist. She was found to have been on warfarin for previous deep vein thrombosis a day after she was referred to the ED. A neurology consultant suspected spinal epidural hematoma, and an MRI showed a fracture at T12 with spinal compression. She was admitted to neurology with traumatic paraplegia. Dr. Campbell and his colleagues said error-producing conditions can result from uncertainty and the need to find an answer quickly can interfere with EPs' ability to diagnose a patient correctly. Dr. Campbell said this case was a classic example where a number of error-producing conditions interacted to produce a missed or delayed diagnosis. “I think it goes into this whole notion of uncertainty to a large degree. Emergency medicine is defined by decisions that people make with inadequate knowledge,” he said. The Price of Uncertainty Dr. Rising and her colleagues, in validating the U-Scale, identified domains of uncertainty related to new or ongoing symptoms. (J Health Psychol 2018. doi: 10.1177/1359105317752827. [Epub ahead of print]; http://bit.ly/2JVU7iw.) These symptoms involved recent ED patients who took part in group concept mapping. Patients were guided through brainstorming, sorting, and refining a set of ideas dealing with questions such as “When experiencing symptoms, people might choose to go to the emergency department when they feel uncertain about...?” The authors noted that their findings suggest that “uncertainty as measured by the U-Scale is only partially related to the state of anxiety and neuroticism, and thus, we are measuring something unique in the patient health care experience.” They said they hope to refine the scale to make it applicable to a variety of populations. Marianna D. LaNoue, PhD, an author of the study, said they want to test the scale in a more suburban setting to make sure they are capturing the full scope of the uncertainty. “The central hypothesis of the work is that the patients are not there because they know they have an acute problem but because they don't know what the right thing to do is,” she said. It is that uncertainty that some payers are seeking to control. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, for example, have set certain penalties for hospitals with patients who return for admission with 30 days at a high rate. Anthem, the nation's largest health insurance company, started to deny payment in 2015 for emergency department visits that the company decided were not truly emergencies. Its policy started in Kentucky, and has spread across several states. The company took a step back, however, when physicians, medical societies, and patients protested in February. Physicians admitted that some patients sought care in the emergency department unnecessarily, but that there is an equal risk that patients will avoid the emergency department when they need it because they fear the cost of an unreimbursed visit. A primary reason for both actions is uncertainty.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,668
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0350,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,357
Écart entre enseignants0,311 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle