Adenoma Detection Rate in a Small Ambulatory Surgery Center
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Colonoscopy is the most common method to diagnose colon cancer. Colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in our country. The adenoma detection rate has been recommended as one of the main quality indicator. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is 25%. ADR is 30 % for men and 20% for women. ADR is the quality indicator with the strongest association to post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer or missed colorectal cancer. Improved adenoma detection rate will decrease the incidence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Newer studies have shown that for each 1% increase in ADR, risk of “missed” CRC decreases by 3%. There are very few studies regarding the adenoma detection rate in Colonoscopy performed in a small ambulatory surgery center. Methods: All patients who underwent screening colonoscopies in our ambulatory surgery center between 2013 to 2015 were included in the data analysis. The ADR is defined as the number of patients out of every 100 undergoing first time screening colonoscopy who have at least one adenoma removed. The withdrawl time was more than 6 minutes in all the screening colonoscopies. The cecal intubation rate was 96.8% in our center. Most of the patient's used split dose colonic prep. The patient's with incomplete colonoscopy secondary to poor prep was excluded from the analysis. Results: There were 4486 procedures performed by two physicians in our ambulatory surgery center. 54.3 % were colonoscopies, 28.8% were upper endoscopies, 0.2 were flexible sigmoidoscopies. 16.6 % were minor surgical procedures like skin abscess drainage, port placement. 616 patient's underwent screening colonoscopies. The mean age of screening colonoscopy group was 58.6 years. Our youngest patient was 50 years old and the oldest was 79 years old. 58.2 % were females and 41.8% were males. 291 patients were found to have adenoma giving adenoma detection rate of 47%. Conclusion: High adenoma detection rate can be achieved in small community ambulatory surgery center provided high quality measures like high cecal intubation rate, good quality prep, increased withdrawl time are achieved diligently. Newer technologies like Fusion scope by Endochoice will also increase the adenoma detection rate. ADR as a quality measure are now being tracked by Medicare and commercial insurance companies. Added pay for performance ADR benchmarks being considered and granted by some commercial payers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».