Micheline Labelle. Racisme et Antiracisme Au Quebec. Discours et Declinaisons
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Micheline Labelle. Racisme et antiracisme au Quebec. Discours et declinaisons. Montreal : Presses de l'Universite du Quebec, 2010. 212 pp. $29.00 sc. This book purports to offer an of state's on racism and anti-racism, as well as position adopted by a few NGOs and citizens who submitted to 2006 public consultation on government policy project designed to fight against racism. The book reviews numerous extracts from these discourses;' round in various public policies and briefs. The author's main objective is to soundness of certain agreed-upon (conventional) ways to approach problem in Quebec (158). Despite book's attractive title and objectives, it exhibits important flaws and omissions, three of which are, in my view, significant: 1. The first one is lack of conceptual framework for analysis in a work that proposes to analyze discourses on racism and anti-racism. Discourse analysis covers a vast multidisciplinary field, that comprises numerous approaches and theoretical debates (Foucault's theory on Habermas's ethics, etcetera). 2. The second one is book's ambition to cover the State's discourse during 2000s--the State comprises many levels of government, normative powers (executive, legislative, judicial), institutions and actors--while it only analyzes governmental discourse, from a few recent provincial policies. Hence, one can question book's choice of ministries and institutions, of NGOs and citizens, because there is no justification of selection criteria. Why were Ministry of Education and Ministry of Health excluded, given that they have adopted policies that concern racism and anti-racism? Why exclude of intellectuals, of researchers or even that of media surrounding 2006 consultation? Why limit one's to 29 out of 124, when author submits, in conclusion, that a strong consensus emanated from all 124 briefs (157)? Consequently, there are astonishing omissions regarding problematization of racism and anti-racism in Quebec. When author describes issues and theoretical debates, she fails not only to mention issues that arise from ethnic and power relationships specific to Quebecois context, but also issues that are specific to research on this question. The author's survey of literature, focused on American and European documentation, cannot provide theoretical and historical context in Quebec, and international issues, although relevant, cannot shed light on reasons underlying different positions that emanate from various discourses in Quebec, nor on how they were expressed. Labelle fails to mention views expressed by researchers since 2000s concerning government's especially recent that puts into perspective strengths and weaknesses of government's on racism (e.g., Marhraoui, McAndrew, Potvin). A more inclusive reading of research in would have allowed her to avoid certain misleading statements on the authors (which ones?) who, she states, analyze neo-racism while negating social representations that are linked to colonial racism, who confuse anti-racism and managing diversity, who adopt an overly extensive (or intersectional) approach. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».