MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2978657118 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30152-5

HIV prevention with post-exposure prophylaxis-in-pocket

2019· letter· en· W2978657118 sur OpenAlexaff
Amila Heendeniya, Isaac I. Bogoch

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Public Health · 2019
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPre-exposure prophylaxisMedicineEmtricitabinePopulationPsychological interventionMen who have sex with menCohortHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Treatment as preventionFamily medicineEnvironmental healthInternal medicineViral loadAntiretroviral therapySyphilisPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

HIV continues to be a major global heath threat and pharmacological prevention measures are important components of the multipronged approach focused on eliminating the disease by 2030.1UNAIDS90-90-90: an ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic.http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/90-90-90_en.pdfDate: 2014Date accessed: September 18, 2018Google Scholar HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)2Grulich AE Guy R Amin J et al.Population-level effectiveness of rapid, targeted, high-coverage roll-out of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men: the EPIC-NSW prospective cohort study.Lancet HIV. 2018; 5: e629-e637Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are two effective pharmacological prevention tools available, and are best integrated with non-pharmacological prevention strategies such as safe-sex counselling and addressing other syndemic health issues. Although these preventative interventions can reduce transmission at individual and community levels,2Grulich AE Guy R Amin J et al.Population-level effectiveness of rapid, targeted, high-coverage roll-out of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men: the EPIC-NSW prospective cohort study.Lancet HIV. 2018; 5: e629-e637Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar gaps in HIV prevention still exist, especially for those who have a low frequency of HIV exposures. For such individuals, daily PrEP with co-formulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine might be highly effective2Grulich AE Guy R Amin J et al.Population-level effectiveness of rapid, targeted, high-coverage roll-out of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men: the EPIC-NSW prospective cohort study.Lancet HIV. 2018; 5: e629-e637Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar but the large pill burden and expense might be disproportionate to a very low HIV exposure frequency. On-demand PrEP might be of benefit as well, but the only data demonstrating efficacy with infrequent use of this approach is with 15 tablets of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine per month, and it is unclear how effective on-demand PrEP would be for individuals with lower usage because of less frequent HIV exposures.3Antoni G, Tremblay C, Charreau I, et al. On-demand PrEP with TDF/FTC remains highly effective among MSM with infrequent sexual intercourse: a sub-study of the ANRS IPERGAY trial. 9th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Science; Paris, France; July 25, 2017 (abstr 3629).Google Scholar On-demand PrEP is also not helpful for people who do not proactively anticipate a potential HIV exposure. PEP is a retroactive approach to HIV prevention and is helpful if accessed within a 72-h window, but there are substantial issues with timely access to medications, adherence to clinic appointments, and adherence to the 28-day course of medication.4Bogoch II Scully EP Zachary KC et al.Patient attrition between the emergency department and clinic among individuals presenting for HIV nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis.Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 58: 1618-1624Crossref PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar So, how can these gaps in HIV prevention be narrowed and care be improved for individuals who have a lower frequency (eg, up to four) of HIV exposures per year? A PEP-in-pocket (PIP) approach might be helpful in these situations.5Tumarkin E Heendeniya A Murphy P Placido T Tan DHS Bogoch II HIV post-exposure prophylaxis-in-pocket (“PIP”) for individuals with low frequency, high risk, HIV exposures.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018; 78: 20-22Crossref Scopus (5) Google Scholar This approach involves providing selected patients with a 28-day prescription for PEP before an exposure occurs. Patients are counselled to obtain the medications and keep them accessible in case of an exposure. Should there be an exposure, patients are advised to initiate medications as soon as possible (and within a 72-h window) and to come to the clinic within the first week of initiating medications for clinical assessment and baseline HIV screening. Patients are typically followed at 6-month intervals for routine screening for HIV and sexually transmitted infections, or sooner based on their exposure history. PIP enables immediate access to antiretroviral medications and might reduce the need for time-sensitive emergency department or clinic visits. PIP empowers patients by providing a degree of autonomy over their care and might also alleviate anxiety associated with potential HIV exposures. Although daily or on-demand PrEP might be appropriate for those with more frequent HIV exposures, PIP is a valuable HIV prevention modality for those who have infrequent exposures. As public health units increasingly provide HIV prevention services, PIP may be integrated into the prevention modalities offered to deliver more targeted care to those at risk of HIV infection. We declare no competing interests.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesIntégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,229
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,068
Tête enseignante GPT0,357
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations19
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Public HealthMême sujetHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsTravaux en français237 207