MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979313480 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.2078.2078

A Pilot Study of Epigenetic-Differentiation Therapy with Decitabine to Treat β-Thalassemia Intermedia

2010· article· en· W2979313480 sur OpenAlexaff
Nancy F. Olivieri, Yogenthiran Saunthararajah, Vivekanandan Thayalasuthan, Janet L. Kwiatkowski, Russell E. Ware, Franz Kuypers, Hae-Young Kim, Elliott Vichinsky

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDecitabineMedicineThalassemiaInternal medicinePharmacologyPediatricsGastroenterologyImmunologyDNA methylationBiologyGene expressionGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2078 Ineffective erythropoiesis, the hallmark of ß-thalassemia, is a result of the myriad deleterious effects of globin chain imbalance. A major translational research goal in thalassemia is to restore α/non-α globin chain balance by inducing expression of γ-globin synthesis from the intact γ-globin gene (HBG). Repression of HBG in adult erythroid cells involves DNA methylation and other epigenetic changes; one possibly useful strategy to re-induce HBG expression is to deplete DNA methyl-transferase 1 (DNMT1) in hematopoietic cells using the cytosine analogue decitabine. A dose and schedule of decitabine intended to deplete DNMT1 without causing significant cytotoxicity was examined in a pilot safety study in ß-thalassemia intermedia, a condition which, despite a lack of requirement for monthly transfusions, is often associated with significant long-term clinical complications. Six patients (≥18 years of age) with ß-thalassemia intermedia were enrolled on study to receive decitabine 0.2 mg/kg subcutaneous 2x/week on consecutive days each week for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks of follow-up. One patient withdrew from study because of fatigue requiring transfusion after week 2. Of the five evaluable patients, two patients received 24 of the 24 planned doses of drug, one patient received 21 of 24 planned doses, and two patients received 16 of 24 planned doses. Doses were missed because of treatment-associated increases in platelet count to >1000 × 109/L which according to protocol, required interruption of therapy. The primary outcome, an increase in total hemoglobin (Hb) of ≥1.5 g/dL above that determined at baseline, was achieved in two of five evaluable patients. In the group overall, Hb increased from a baseline of (mean ± SEM) 7.88 ± 0.88 g/dL to a peak of 9.04 ± 0.77 g/dL (P = 0.004); peak values in Hb were observed from the 6th to 12th week of treatment. Absolute fetal Hb increased from a baseline of (mean ± SEM) 3.34 ± 0.97 g/dL to a peak of 4.39 ± 1.15 g/dL (P = 0.021); peak values in fetal Hb were observed in the 4th to 12th week of treatment. Reflecting decreased hemolysis and more effective erythropoiesis, indirect bilirubin declined from (mean ± SEM) 3.2 ± 1.0 mg/dL to a nadir of 2.2± 0.8 mg/dL, while reduction in serum LDH from (mean ± SEM) 479.4 ± 125.8 U/L to 362.8 ± 100.4 U/L was not significant (P =0.083). Platelet counts increased from a baseline of (mean ± SEM) 585.2 ± 90.6 (x109/L) to a peak of 940.2 ± 184.3 (x109/L) (P = 0.007); peak platelet values were observed between the 6th to 12th weeks of treatment. These increases triggered interruption of therapy in three of the five evaluable patients. In the only patient not previously splenectomized, minimal change in platelet count was observed (baseline, 233 ×109/L; peak, 296 ×109/L). No clinical events were associated with the increased platelet counts. Changes in neutrophil count, from (mean ± SEM) 6.51 ± 1.20 (x109/L) to 3.36 ± 0.63 (x109/L) were not significant (P = 0.069). The lowest neutrophil counts were observed between the 4th and 10th week of treatment. Two quantitative in vitro assays for mutagenicity, specifically enumeration of illegitimate VDJ recombination events and micronuclei within early reticulocytes, were performed at baseline, midpoint, and study exit. No significant changes were identified between baseline and 24-week values from either laboratory assay. In this first clinical study of decitabine in patients with β-thalassemia, drug dose was aimed at induction of DNMT1 depletion; the frequent but intermittent schedule of administration was intended to modify differentiation without causing prolonged cytostasis resulting in cytopenia. Consistent with a non-cytotoxic/cytostatic, differentiation-altering mechanism of action, the dose-limiting toxicity observed was not thrombocytopenia or neutropenia, but asymptomatic increases in platelet count. In conclusion, decitabine therapy was well-tolerated in thalassemia intermedia. Significant mean and individual increases in total and fetal hemoglobin concentrations observed in this study may direct the selection of patients in extended trials, to explore the potential of chromatin-relaxing therapy for β-thalassemia. Disclosures: Off Label Use: FDA approved decitabine for use in MDS, therefore, its use in thalassemia is off-label. Furthermore, the dose, schedule and route of administration used is also not on the label. Decitabine was used in a study to augment production of fetal hemoglobin in an NIH sponsored trial.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207