MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979315362 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.1433.1433

Steroids Are Less Effective In Treating Thrombocytopenia Caused by Immune Responses Against Platelet GPIbα: A Comparative Study Using Passive and Active ITP Models.

2010· article· en· W2979315362 sur OpenAlexaff
Elisa Simpson, Guangheng Zhu, Conglei Li, Lingyan Zhu, Qingshu Zeng, John W. Semple, John Freedman, Heyu Ni

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmune thrombocytopeniaPlateletAntibodyAutoantibodyImmune systemImmunologyMonoclonal antibodyDexamethasoneSplenocyteMedicinePharmacologyInternal medicineChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1433 Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a common autoimmune disorder in which autoantibodies are generated against a patient's platelets, leading to decreased platelet counts and bleeding diatheses. Autoantibodies in ITP mainly target platelet receptors GPIIbIIIa (αIIbβ3 integrin) and GPIbα. Current first-line therapy for ITP patients is steroids, while intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a common second-line therapy. However, not all patients are responsive and we lack useful exclusion criteria for steroid therapy. Appropriate identification of non-responsive patients would facilitate proper treatment and limit side effects. We previously showed anti-GPIbα (versus anti-GPIIbIIIa) mediated ITP is less responsive to IVIG (Blood. 2006;108(3):943-6). Our preliminary data from human patients also suggests that patients with anti-GPIbα antibodies are less responsive to steroids. However, these data need to be confirmed and mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Methods: To examine whether antibody specificity (GPIIbIIIa or GPIbα) correlates with responsiveness to steroids and determine the target immune cells for steroid action, we used two murine ITP models (passive antibody transfer model and active splenocyte transfer model (Blood. 2010;115:1247-53)). In both models, mice are treated with the corticosteroid Dexamethasone (DEX) and platelet counts are monitored. In the passive antibody transfer model: BALB/c or C57 mice were pretreated for 3 days with 0.1mg/kg, 1mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg of DEX prior to injection with our newly developed mouse-anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting GPIIbIIIa or GPIbα. A second group of mice were treated with DEX 1 day following mAb injection (i.e. after becoming thrombocytopenic) and daily thereafter. In both groups, platelet counts were monitored for 4 consecutive days post mAb injection. In the active splenocyte transfer model: β3-/- and GPIbα-/- mice were immunized with wild-type (WT) platelets resulting in an antibody titer of >1:12,800. Purified splenocytes from immunized mice were transferred into syngeneic WT or SCID recipients, such that they developed ITP. Recipient mice were treated with 1mg/kg or 10 mg/kg of DEX starting 1 day after splenocyte transfer, and daily thereafter. Platelet counts were monitored. Results and Discussion: In the passive ITP model, irrespective of DEX dose, route of administration (i.p. or s.c.) or mouse strain, pretreatment with DEX was unable to ameliorate ITP induced by either anti-GPIIbIIIa or anti-GPIbα mAbs. In addition to pretreating with DEX, administration of DEX following ITP induction also appeared to be unable to ameliorate ITP induced by either anti-GPIIbIIIa or anti-GPIbα mAbs. Similar results were obtained in the passive model when using the corticosteroid Prednisolone in a different experimental setting. In the active splenocyte transfer model, we found that varying doses of DEX ameliorated ITP in mice engrafted with anti-GPIIbIIIa reactive splenocytes while untreated mice remained thrombocytopenic. Importantly, DEX failed to show a significant effect on ITP amelioration in mice engrafted with anti-GPIbα reactive splenocytes. Since the passive model involves exogenous administration of mAb, the effect of steroid treatment is largely limited to effects on the reticuloendothelial system (RES) and destruction of opsonized platelets. Conversely, the splenocyte transfer model allows for steroid effects on active immune responses (i.e. it may affect dendritic cells, T cells, B cells, etc.) in addition to the RES. As DEX was efficacious in only the splenocyte transfer model, this suggests steroids primarily affect upstream of the immune responses in ITP. Ongoing experiments involving depletion of CD4+, CD8+, or CD19+ splenocytes will help elucidate specific immune cells as targets of DEX. Conclusions: Our data clearly demonstrated that DEX ameliorated anti-GPIIbIIIa mediated ITP but was not significantly effective for amelioration of anti-GPIbα mediated ITP in the active splenocyte transfer model. We also demonstrated that steroid therapy failed in our passive ITP model. This finding is consistent with our preliminary data in human patients (patients with anti-GPIbα antibodies may be refractory to both IVIG and steroids). This may explain the clinical variability seen in response to steroids and lead to new diagnostic/therapeutic approaches. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,309
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→