Multilevel Modeling to Predict Factors Influencing the Length of Stay for An Inpatient Malignant Hematology Service
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 4733 Purpose: Inpatient care represents a significant cost and resource allocation issue for hospitals. The purpose of this study was to examine factors in an administrative dataset that might predict the length of stay (LOS) for inpatients with a variety of hematological malignancies and to create a simple predictive model. There is a lack of published models for this in malignant hematology patients. Methods: Data was obtained from the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) maintained by Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) for the years 2002–2005. The data abstracted included patient demographics, type and route of admission, length of stay, resource intensity weights (RIW) and a complexity code. The disease category/diagnosis is based on the case mix group (CMG) which is a simplified grouping of diseases based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system. The Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre is a tertiary referral center dealing with all varieties of adult hematological malignancies including stem cell transplantation. The data for this study did not include patients who were treated with an allogeneic stem cell transplant. Potential factors collected on admission were modeled to be nested among individual patients using longitudinal multi-level modeling. Factors entered in the model included: age and age2, route of entry to the hospital (direct vs. emergency room vs. other), area of residence, gender, day of the admission (weekday vs. weekend) and diagnosis (CMG). We also added the number of previous admissions as a baseline variable. Institutional research ethics board approval was granted for this study. Results: Data was collected on 713 patients representing 1,739 admissions and 17,661 days of in-patient services. The number of admissions ranged from 1 to 15 with a mean of 2.5 and median 2.0 admissions per patient. The range for LOS was 1 to 155 days with mean of 10.6 days (SD 13.8) and median of 64 days. The median age of patients was 62.6 years with a range of 17–95 years, and 45% of patients were female. Thirty-nine percent of patients had a diagnosis related to a lymphoproliferative disorder or a chronic leukemia and 19 percent related to the administration of chemotherapy. Factors with non-significant B (slope) value were omitted from the model. Age is centered around the mean. Errors and residuals (μ , r) have a mean of zero and a normal distribution. Age and previous number of admissions were the most important factors in predicting LOS. The final model for estimated LOS is as follows: LOS = 3.9658+μ 0+(0.2068+μ 1)(age-65)+(4.508+μ 2)(number of previous admissions) +r The variances for the different residuals have been estimated from the model as: μ 0=73.82, μ 1=0.2436, μ 2=0.2436 and r=69.47. For each increment by 5 years above the average age, the LOS increases by 1 day and for each previous admission the LOS increases by 4.5 days. The Pseudo-R squared is approximately 0.50. Conclusion: Of the factors considered in this administrative database, age and the number of previous admissions were the only relevant factors at the time of admission which could predict LOS. This model represents a relatively simple method to estimate the LOS for patients with hematological malignancies admitted to a dedicated hematological unit. Such a model highlights patients at risk of prolonged LOS and may allow health care practitioners to focus on interventions geared towards shortening length of stay. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».