MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979405160 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.314.314

Pilot Study of Online Learning Modules for Hemoglobinopathy Education in Canadian Hematology Training Programs

2016· article· en· W2979405160 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Madeleine Verhovsek, Chenchen Hou, Mona Azzam, Vicky R. Breakey, Richard Ward, Shannon M. Bates, Anthony J Levinson

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCurriculumHemoglobinopathyMedicineMedical educationHematologyFamily medicineInternal medicinePsychologyDiseasePedagogy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: In North America, there are a growing number of patients with hemoglobinopathies, including sickle cell disease and thalassemia. As previously identified in needs assessment surveys of Canadian hematology training program directors and fellows (Verhovsek et. al. 2014 - https://ash.confex.com/ash/2014/webprogram/Paper71742.html), hemoglobinopathy learning constitutes an integral component of the hematology residency curriculum, however there are significant differences in volume and case-mix of hemoglobinopathy exposure among training programs. Fellows and program directors expressed strong interest in online e-learning modules to address gaps in clinical and laboratory learning. As such, we developed a set of e-learning modules for hemoglobinopathies that were implemented as a pilot study. We hypothesized that the e-learning-based curriculum would enhance education and standardize curricular exposure between Canadian hematology programs. Methods: Based on the National Hemoglobinopathy Learning Objectives, a curriculum of 12 case-based modules was developed. Modules were implemented as a pilot study in four Canadian hematology training programs using a distributed practice model - two modules every two months over the 12-month academic year. Training programs were selected based on baseline hemoglobinopathy exposure in their curriculum (two programs with high baseline exposure and two programs with low baseline exposure). Fellows completed the modules independently. Learning was supplemented with bimonthly module review sessions facilitated by expert faculty. In programs where the program directors did not identify a local faculty member with content expertise, review sessions were run by web conference. Data were collected regarding the efficacy of the intervention through three main formats: in-person fellow focus groups, online fellow questionnaires, and sets of designated hemoglobinopathy-related questions at the annual National Hematology Online Practice Exam for all Canadian Hematology fellows. Results: From online graded survey responses (1 to 5, "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"), 97% of respondents indicated the modules were relevant to their particular learning needs (Mean 4.39, SD = 0.55). All survey respondents indicated the case scenarios were realistic, and 95% felt that the e-learning software was easy to use, engaging and offered flexibility of computer-based learning. Responses in focus group feedback sessions mirrored the survey findings: modules were described as "very useful", "realistic", and of high production quality, with participants indicating they felt the issue of variability in case mix could be addressed with online cases. With respect to the expert-led case review sessions, the majority of focus group responses indicated they were valuable and enhanced the learning obtained from online modules, with review sessions being increasingly useful with later modules that were more challenging. In addition, both online survey responses and focus group feedback identified that participants would strongly recommend the modules to their colleagues (97% of survey responses, Mean 4.43, SD = 0.56). Finally, comparing results of the annual National Hematology Online Practice exam, programs that participated in the online hemoglobinopathy modules saw their fellows achieve a higher incremental change in their score from 2015 to 2016, as compared to their counterparts who did not participate in the online modules (increase of 18.5% vs. 14.8%). Conclusion/Implications: In this pilot implementation study, online hemoglobinopathy modules were shown to have high usability and user satisfaction with content. Fellows agreed that the e-learning modules addressed current gaps in curricula and variability in case-mix exposure. Among fellows who have completed the annual National Hematology Online Practice Exam, comparison of the 2015 and 2016 exam scores in participating and non-participating programs indicated improved performance on hemoglobinopathy-related questions. Taken together, our study has shown that our proposed e-learning-based curriculum has been a successful intervention in promoting, standardizing and enhancing education in hemoglobinopathies among Canadian hematology programs. Disclosures Bates: Eli Lilly Canada: Other: Partial salary support through Eli Lilly Canada/May Cohen Chair in Women's Health.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,984
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,474

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207