MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979452863 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.3761.3761

Subcutaneous Omacetaxine in Chronic or Accelerated Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Resistant to Two or More Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors Including Imatinib,

2011· article· en· W2979452863 sur OpenAlexaff
Jörge E. Cortes, Franck E. Nicolini, Meir Wetzler, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Luke P. Akard, Adam Craig, Nisha Nanda, Carrie Dial, Annie‐Claude Benichou, Katie Cairati, Michele Baccarani, Gerard T. Kennealey, Hagop M. Kantarjian

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineImatinibMyeloid leukemiaInternal medicineDasatinibLeukemiaChronic myelogenous leukemiaImatinib mesylateTyrosine-kinase inhibitorTyrosine kinasePharmacologyGastroenterologyCancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3761 Background Omacetaxine is a first-in-class, reversible, transient inhibitor of protein elongation that does not depend on BCR-ABL binding. By blocking ribosomal function, the drug decreases intracellular levels of several antiapoptotic regulatory proteins, inducing antitumor activity via apoptosis [Pérez-Galán P et al. Blood 2007;109:4441–9]. Omacetaxine had clinical activity and was well tolerated in two phase 2, open-label, multicenter studies, including 1 in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with T315I mutation who had failed prior imatinib [Cortes et al, EHA 2011 Abstract 1012] and the second in CML patients with resistance or intolerance to ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) [Cortes et al, ASH 2009 Abstract 861]. Methods This analysis included patients with CML-chronic phase (CML-CP) and CML-accelerated phase (CML-AP) from either of the two phase 2 studies mentioned above. All patients had previously been treated with ≥2 TKIs (including imatinib), to which they had shown resistance (eg, via point mutations) or intolerance. All patients received omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m2 subcutaneously twice daily for 14 consecutive days every 28 days for induction and for 7 days every 28 days as maintenance. The number of consecutive days of dosing could be adjusted, as clinically indicated. Recombinant growth factors could be administered if necessary. The primary endpoints for CML-CP patients were major cytogenetic response (MCyR) or complete hematologic response (CHR), and for CML-AP patients they were major hematologic response (MHR) or no evidence of leukemia (NEL). Patients were followed for survival after omacetaxine discontinuation. Results Of 122 patients, 81 had CML-CP (median age 59 years; range 26–83) and 41 had CML-AP (median age 63 years; range 23–83). All patients had previously received imatinib; 85% of CML-CP patients and 93% of CML-AP patients had received dasatinib, 59% and 63% nilotinib, and 14% and 17% other antineoplastic agents other than TKIs, respectively. Sixty-nine patients had shown resistance to ≥2 TKIs, 7 showed intolerance, and 5 resistance to 1 and intolerance to another. Previous treatments ended a median 1.3 (range 0.2–28) months prior to the study in CML-CP patients and a median 2.1 (range -4 to 33) months in CML-AP patients. Median on-study exposure to omacetaxine was 7.4 (range 0–39) months among CML-CP and 1.9 (0–30) months among CML-AP patients. In the CML-CP group, 16 patients (20%) achieved a MCyR (8 [10%] complete, 8 [10%] partial); the median duration of MCyR was 18 months (range 4 to ongoing). In addition, 4 (5%) had a minor cytogenetic response. Fifty-six (69%) achieved CHR with a median response duration of 12.2 months (range 8–26); median onset time was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5–1.2) months. The median overall survival was 34 months. In the CML-AP group, 11 patients (27%) had a MHR, including 10 (24%) with CHR and 1 (2%) with NEL; the median duration of MHR was 9 months (range 4–14). In addition, 2 (5%) achieved a return to chronic phase and 3 (7%) had hematologic improvement. Three (7%) patients had a minor and 3 (7%) had a minimal cytogenetic response. The median overall survival was 16 months. The most common cause for discontinuation was disease progression: 5 (6%) of CML-CP and 5 (12%) of CML-AP patients. Among CML-CP and CML-AP patients, 12% and 24%, respectively, discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs) of all types, excluding disease progression. The most common serious AEs (>5% in either group) for CML-CP and CML-AP patients, respectively, were febrile neutropenia (7.4%, 12.2%), bone marrow failure (11.1%, 0), and thrombocytopenia (11.1%, 7.3%), excluding disease progression. The most common (>15% in both groups) grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities for CML-CP and CML-AP patients, respectively, were anemia (37%, 34%), neutropenia (47%, 22%), and thrombocytopenia (67%, 46%). The most frequent (≥5% in either group) nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs in CML-CP and CML-AP patients, respectively, were general disorders (eg, aplasia, fatigue, generalized edema) (9%, 5%), infections (5%, 2%), metabolism and nutrition (0, 10%), and respiratory (1%, 5%). Conclusions Patients with CML who had failed previous treatment with ≥2 TKIs showed clinically meaningful response to omacetaxine therapy. Omacetaxine was well tolerated in this population. Disclosures: Cortes: ChemGenex: ChemGenex is now Cephalon, Inc., Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Omacetaxine is an investigational drug. Nicolini:Bristol Myers Squibb France: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Norvartis Pharma France: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Wetzler:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; ChemGenex (Cephalon): Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Akard:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Craig:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Nanda:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Dial:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Benichou:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Cairati:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kennealey:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Kantarjian:ChemGenex: ChemGenex is now Cephalon, Inc., Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207