MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979645117 · doi:10.1097/01.jaa.0000586340.96748.c3

Addressing the health, safety, welfare, and dignity of all humans

2019· article· en· W2979645117 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leeann Kuehn, John Balbus

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAAPA · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueClimate Change and Health Impacts
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClimate changeGreenhouse gasUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeGlobal healthCountdownNatural resource economicsEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental healthBusinessPolitical scienceEconomic growthHealth careKyoto ProtocolMedicineEnvironmental scienceEconomicsEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

FigureFigureFigureA series of major national and international reports, released in the fall of 2018, highlighted the urgent need for action on climate change, and the importance of understanding the health implications of this environmental crisis. The first of these was the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 1.5° report, which documented that serious effects on human health as well as other sectors and planetary systems would occur with an increase in global average temperature of 1.5° C, below the 2° C target set in the Paris Agreement of 2015, and estimated that efforts to limit temperature increases to 1.5° C would need to be initiated in about 12 years.1 The second major international report was submitted by the World Health Organization to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the body that oversees the international climate change negotiations.2 This report documented both the substantial global burden of disease anticipated to result from future climate change, especially in developing countries, as well as the substantial benefits to health of reducing greenhouse gas emissions through reductions in conventional air pollutants. A third report, the US Fourth National Climate Assessment, stated that: Climate change affects the health of all Americans Although all patients are exposed, exposure and resilience vary across populations and communities. Adaptation reduces risk and improves health. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions results in health and economic benefits.3 Finally, the Lancet 2030 countdown produced international and national reports, which documented worsening health risks and ongoing progress in climate action from a health perspective.4,5 Here are some of the most important points to take away from all of this information: First, climate change affects the health of your patients. Increased exposure to heat can affect patients with chronic diseases and interact with their medications, including diuretics, antihistamines, beta-blockers, and a range of medications for mental health disorders.6 Infectious diseases may be changing in onset or severity or even appearing or disappearing in your region.7 The full extent of anticipated changes is detailed in the US Global Change Research Program's climate and health assessment (https://health2016.globalchange.gov). Although the health effects of climate change are numerous and daunting, physician assistants (PAs) are not powerless to combat them. On a daily basis, PAs identify and target the unique risk factors that predispose entire communities and individual patients to acute and chronic disease. Climate change interacts with our health in similar fashion, and by combining a patient's health profile and projected local climate effects, clinicians can give targeted, often novel medical advice. To help healthcare professionals learn more, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences has developed free climate change and human health lesson materials, available at http://nih.gov/lessonsinclimatechange. These materials teach interested clinicians how to reframe the discussion of climate health through a clinical lens, targeting their specific treatment populations of choice. Second, healthcare facilities have a critical role to play, both in ensuring their continuity of operations despite increasingly severe and frequent extreme weather events, and also in minimizing their environmental footprint and contribution to greenhouse gas accumulations.8 Nearly 10% of all US greenhouse gas emissions come from the healthcare sector alone. If the US healthcare system were a country, it would rank 13th for greenhouse gas emissions as of 2016. Non-greenhouse gas emissions are responsible for significant indirect morbidity, from increased smog days, particulate matter-associated respiratory disease, and environmental acidification, all of which affect human health.9 The calculated health burden of healthcare-associated emissions specifically is on the same order of magnitude as patient deaths due to preventable medical errors.9 Focusing on minimizing waste can be economically and environmentally beneficial for healthcare providers and patients. PAs can use the Choosing Wisely Campaign (www.choosingwisely.org) to deliver high-value care, eliminate unnecessary interventions, and reduce the environmental effect of their practice. More information on sustainability in healthcare systems is available from the Advisory Board at www.advisory.com/community-impact/health-care-sustainability-initiative. Advocating for institutional sustainability in hospital systems, for example through membership in an organization such as Practice Greenhealth (https://noharm-uscanada.org/content/us-canada/practice-greenhealth), can amplify the positive effects of daily waste reduction and reduced emissions. In areas with major anticipated climate effects, clinicians can advocate for smarter, forward-looking construction and mitigation strategies to anticipate damage caused by severe weather.3,10 Third, healthcare professionals have a unique voice and privilege in society to raise awareness on the seriousness of climate change. The need for global action to curb greenhouse gas accumulation and avert the most severe and most rapid climate change has been made clear by the 2018 reports. PAs can educate their patients and join with other healthcare professionals through groups such as the Medical Society Consortium on Climate and Health and Health Care Without Harm. PAs are trusted members of the community, responsible for translating science into tangible, accessible concepts for their patients. Patients trust and rely on us to stay up-to-date, to practice evidence-based medicine, and to guard their well-being. The health risks posed by climate change merit similar counseling to the risks posed by driving without a seat belt, eating too much salt, or smoking cigarettes. Armed with the right tools and awareness, PAs can be peer leaders in climate health advocacy and patient safety.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,303
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,152
Tête enseignante GPT0,366
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAAPAMême sujetClimate Change and Health ImpactsTravaux en français237 207