MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979783168 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.1440.1440

Incidence and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Study

2016· article· en· W2979783168 sur OpenAlexaff
Siavash Piran, Sam Schulman

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Établissements canadiensThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research InstituteMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePulmonary embolismIncidence (geometry)Deep veinRetrospective cohort studyThrombosisVenous thrombosisSpinal cord injurySurgerySpinal cord

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The true incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is unclear. The management of thromboprophylaxis varies among clinicians and is challenging due to the balance against bleeding. There is limited data on the risk factors associated with VTE in patients with an acute SCI. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive adult patients with acute traumatic or non-traumatic SCI presenting within 1 week of injury from 2009 to 2015. We excluded patients who were already on therapeutic oral anticoagulation, those who had a short hospital admission (<7 days), and patients who had early transfer to a different hospital location (<30 days from the initial admission). The primary outcome was incidence of symptomatic, objectively verified deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) within 90 days. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding, all-cause mortality, and fatal PE. Step-wise cox modeling analyses were used to identify risk factors for VTE. Results: A total of 211 eligible patients were initially screened and 60 patients were excluded: 34 patients had short hospital admissions, 17 were transferred to a different hospital location (median time of 11 days, range 5 to 29 days), 3 had another reason for admission, and 6 patients were already on therapeutic anticoagulation. The remaining 151 patients with acute SCI were analyzed. Median age was 51 (range 17 to 91 years) and 106 (70%) were males. Patients were followed for a median of 90 days (range 1 to 90 days) and the median length of hospital stay was 79 days (range 1 to 90 days). Hundred and eleven patients (73.5%) had paraplegia or tetraplegia, 10 patients (6.6%) had no neurological impairment, and the degree of impairment was unspecified in 30 patients (19.9%). A total of 112 patients (74.2%) had a traumatic SCI with a fracture, 34 (22.5%) had a traumatic SCI without a fracture, and 5 (3.3%) had a non-traumatic SCI. Ninety four patients (62.2%) had a SCI alone versus 57 (37.8%) who had other sites of injury in addition to a SCI. The median duration of thromboprophylaxis was 65 days (range 2 to 90 days). Majority of the patients (59.6%) received low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) either alone (85 of 151, 56.3%) or sequentially with warfarin (5 of 151, 3.6%) with international normalized ratio range of 2 to 3 compared to 48 patients (31.8%) who received increased intensity LMWH either alone (9 of 151, 6%) or sequentially with low-dose LMWH (39 of 151, 25.8%). Thirteen patients (8.6%) had no thromboprophylaxis. Of the 151 patients included in the analysis, 17 patients (11%) had symptomatic VTE (9 PEs, 6 lower extremity DVT, 1 upper extremity DVT, and 1 with both a DVT and PE). The median time of VTE occurrence was 18 days (range 2 to 65 days) (Figure 1). There was no statistical difference in rate of VTE between the standard prophylactic LMWH group compared to those who received increased intensity LMWH (13.3% versus 8.3%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-2.1, p = 0.58). Six patients (4%) had major bleeding and none had a fatal PE. The median time of major bleeding occurrence was 17 days (range 8 to 40 days). The all-cause mortality rate was 13.9%. The median time of all-cause death was 6 days (range 1 to 61 days). In the univariate analyses, male sex (OR 14.95; 95% CI, 1.05-49.1, p = 0.003) and having other sites of injuries along with SCI (OR 2.6; 95% CI. 0.8- 8.7, p = 0.049) were significantly associated with the risk of VTE. In stepwise Cox modeling, independent contributors to risk for VTE were other sites of injuries (hazard ratio [HR] 6.07), age (HR 1.05 per year) and to some extent the presence of leg paresis/para- or tetraplegia (HR 2.7), whereas hypertension appeared to reduce the risk (HR 0.18). The gender variable could not be included due to zero events for females. Conclusions: Symptomatic VTE is still today a frequent complication in patients with acute SCI and can occur early after injury. Male sex, age and presence of other sites of injuries along with SCI were independent risk factors for symptomatic VTE. Future randomized trials assessing the role of direct oral anticoagulants versus the current standard of care using low-dose LMWH among these higher risk patients are needed. Figure Survival without symptomatic VTE after SCI Figure. Survival without symptomatic VTE after SCI Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→Travaux en français237 207→