MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979817211 · doi:10.1353/roe.2019.0004

Dynamic Horizons: A Research and Conceptual Summary of Outdoor Education by Chloe Humphreys

2019· article· en· W2979817211 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Timothy S. O’Connell, Garrett Hutson

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch in outdoor education · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueOutdoor and Experiential Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOutdoor educationCurriculumConceptual frameworkSociologyOperationalizationPedagogyNew horizonsEnvironmental educationInterpersonal communicationPsychologySocial scienceEngineeringEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Dynamic Horizons: A Research and Conceptual Summary of Outdoor Education by Chloe Humphreys Timothy S. O’Connell (bio) and Garrett Hutson (bio) Dynamic Horizons: A Research and Conceptual Summary of Outdoor Education. Written by Chloe Humphreys, Kingston, ON, Council of Outdoor Educators of Ontario, 2018, 77 pp., CDN $20.00 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-988127-01-9 The follow-up to the well-received overview of outdoor education literature and research, Reconnecting Children Through Outdoor Education: A Research Summary (Foster & Linney, 2007), this contemporary synopsis provides a rich and illuminating examination of our current understanding of outdoor education. Dynamic Horizons: A Research and Conceptual Summary of Outdoor Education (Humphreys, 2018) expands on this previous work and explores the widening breadth and depth of how outdoor education is operationalized not only in Canada, but around the world. Sponsored by the Council of Outdoor Educators of Ontario (COEO; www.coeo.org), this summary is organized around the Council’s four pillars central to outdoor education. These include Education for Curriculum, Education for Environment, Education for Character, and Education for Well-Being (Council of Outdoor Educators of Ontario, 2019). Education for Curriculum relates the natural world to “real life” and the considers how school experiences further students’ understanding of the environment and related processes. Education for Environment encourages a personal connection to nature, promotes environmental ethics, and fosters awareness of how these ideas apply to a range of settings. Education for Character investigates impacts on personal and interpersonal growth, development of important individual characteristics such as leadership and empathy and focuses on group dynamics. Finally, Education for Well-Being explores how [End Page 82] participation in outdoor education activities promotes mental, physical, and spiritual health and development (COEO, 2019). While Reconnecting Children Through Outdoor Education: A Research Summary (Foster & Linney, 2007) focused on outcomes, Dynamic Horizons: A Research and Conceptual Summary of Outdoor Education (Humphreys, 2018) explores evolving themes from a whole-student perspective. Interestingly, eleven Outdoor Educators from Canada each identified five influential research articles from the previous decade. These served as a starting point for the author’s review of the literature included in this summary. A reference list including these articles and books is a nice addition to the end of the summary. As previously mentioned, the four pillars of outdoor education (i.e., Education for Curriculum, Education for Environment, Education for Character, and Education for Well-Being) serve as the main organizational framework for this work. This framework proves easy to use as subheadings help the reader navigate to topics of interest. For example, Education for Curriculum includes subheadings such as: Learning by Doing and Lived Experience, Place-based Education and Decolonization, and Gender and Feminism among others. Education for Environment is comprised of The Anthropocene, Indigenous Influence on “Place,” and Decolonizing for example. Education for Character includes Intellectual Virtues, Civic Virtues, Practical Wisdom, and Performance Virtues. Finally, Education for Well-Being encompasses such topics as Body or Physical well-being, Mental, Mind, Emotions and Heart, and Spiritual perspectives. A brief overview of the theoretical frameworks and underlying concepts discussed in each of these four areas helps situate the topics and provides insight into the author’s predispositions and analyses of the research. This is helpful in contextualizing both the “big picture” of each section as well as illuminates how the topics are intertwined together. While there are some abrupt changes between a few of the topical areas, the writing generally flows well, is coherent, and is easy to understand. Similarly, a short summary captures the flavor of each section and often asks questions about where outdoor education might be in the following decade. One feature of note in Dynamic Horizons: A Research and Conceptual Summary of Outdoor Education (Humphreys, 2018) is recognition of cultural and Indigenous aspects related to each of the four pillars and related research literature. As acknowledgement of Indigenous, First Nations, Aboriginal and Métis knowledge and ways has increased in Canada since the 2015 report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (www.trc.ca), inclusion of practical, theoretical and social-justice oriented literature is a highlight of this summary. For example, in the Education for Environment [End Page 83] section, Indigenous Influence...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,122
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,242

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,012
Communication savante0,0080,013
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,072
Tête enseignante GPT0,493
Écart entre enseignants0,421 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearch in outdoor educationMême sujetOutdoor and Experiential EducationTravaux en français237 207