MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979856584 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.1968.1968

Effect of Physical Activity (PA) Interventions On Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2012· review· en· W2979856584 sur OpenAlexaff
Alina S. Gerrie, Siobhan White, Katherine Harvey, Ritu Gill, Cynthia L. Toze

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCancer survivorship and care
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMeta-analysisPsychological interventionQuality of life (healthcare)PlaceboInternal medicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationRandomized controlled trialBody mass indexTransplantationPhysical therapyMEDLINEGerontologyAlternative medicinePathologyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1968 Background: Recent advances in HSCT have resulted in improved overall and relapse-free survival and decreased incidence of serious complications. Improved survival has prompted an increased focus on enhancing HRQoL. There is an accumulating body of evidence emphasizing that physical activity (PA) may be one modifiable lifestyle factor associated with decreased negative side effects related to HSCT and improved HRQoL. We sought to summarize the available evidence related to the effects of PA participation and HRQoL in HSCT recipients. Methods: We searched electronic databases including Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and conference proceedings from American Society of Hematology and American Society of Clinical Oncology to April 1, 2012. No language or publication date limits were used. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental trials with a control group comparing exercise interventions with placebo-control or standard of care in adult HSCT recipients. Exercise was defined as any form of PA that was performed on a repeated basis for a fixed time frame over a fixed time interval. Included studies were required to have a HRQoL measure as a primary (1o) or secondary (2o) outcome. Change in global HRQoL from pre to post-intervention for intervention and control groups were compared using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by calculating the Q- and I2 statistics. Meta-regression was performed for the following study characteristics: total number (no.) of study participants; mean age; % female; average body mass index (BMI); mean exercise duration in minutes per session; intervention length in weeks; % adherence; type of transplant (allo- or combination of allo- and auto-transplants); and whether HRQoL was a 1o or 2o outcome. Sensitivity analysis assessed the cumulative effect of studies by publication year and no. of participants. Influential analysis was conducted to determine change in pooled effect estimate by removing one study at a time. Publication bias was assessed the Begg's rank correlation and Egger's regression test and plot. Results: Of the 1606 studies originally identified, 7 studies involving 420 patients who underwent HSCT (of which 208 were assigned to exercise or PA intervention) met all inclusion criteria. One study was excluded from the final analysis as it was identified as an extreme outlier. All 6 remaining studies used the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) measurement tool thus weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for ease of interpretation. Participation in an exercise intervention resulted in an increase in global HRQoL with a WMD of 4.72 points (95% CI: −0.04, 9.47; P = 0.05). The proportion of variability in WMD attributed to intra-study heterogeneity was 65% (95% CI: 15%, 85%; P = 0.02) and was due primarily to variation in exercise intervention protocols and study quality. Meta-regression identified that whether HRQoL was a 1o or 2o outcome significantly affected the pooled effect estimate (P=0.02). Sensitivity analysis did not reveal any important trends. Influential analysis demonstrated that the study with the most influence when removed was Baumann A, where WMD decreased to 2.86 points (95% CI: −1.25, 8.57). There was no statistical evidence of publication bias by assessment with the Egger's regression test (coefficient for bias 2.35, 95% CI −1.90 to, 6.59, P = 0.20) and Begg's rank correlation test (Z-score 0.75 with continuity correction, P = 0.45). Conclusions: This analysis summarizes the best available evidence regarding effect of exercise participation on overall self-reported HRQoL in adult HSCT recipients. The pooled estimate, after excluding outliers, showed that exercise participation resulted in a 4.72 point increase in the global HRQoL score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 measure, which was borderline statistically significant (P =0.05). This effect estimate is similar in magnitude to pivotal meta-analyses of exercise interventions in breast cancer survivors. Substantial heterogeneity existed among included trials. Larger RCTs with a strong focus on study quality and long-term effects of exercise participation should be conducted. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,048

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,022
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0210,036
Bibliométrie0,0060,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,110
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCancer survivorship and care→Travaux en français237 207→