Continuous Improvement of Bone Mineral Density Two Years Post Zoledronic Acid Discontinuation in Patients with Thalassemia-Induced Osteoporosis: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Zoledronic acid is a third generation aminobisphosphonate with proven efficacy in patients with thalassemia major (TM) and osteoporosis. We report here the results of the long-term follow-up (36 months) of our TM patients with osteoporosis who participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, trial with zoledronic acid. Sixty-six patients with TM-induced osteoporosis (21M/45F; median age 35.5 years) were studied. The majority of patients had pathological fractures and/or bone pain due to osteoporosis. Patients were blindly randomized to receive zoledronic acid at a dose of 4 mg, iv, in 15 min infusion, every 6 months (group A, n=23) or every 3 months (group B, n=21), or to receive placebo every 3 months (group C, n=22) for a period of one year. There was no difference in terms of gonadal dysfunction between the three studied groups. All patients were under oral calcium (500 mg) administration during study period, while hypogonadic patients were allowed to continue their hormonal replacement therapy. After the first 12 months of therapy, patients of groups A and B discontinued zoledronic acid treatment, while patients of group C were allowed to receive zoledronic acid at a dose of 4 mg, every 3 months, for 12 months and then to stop zoledronic acid therapy. Effects were monitored by measuring BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck and forearm using DEXA, at baseline, and then after 12 and 36 months post zoledronic acid administration. Patients were also asked to quantify their degree of bone pain on Huskisson’s visual analogue scale and the McGill-Melzack scoring system at baseline, and then every 6 months for 36 months. Patients of groups A and C showed no differences in terms of BMD of all three evaluated sites after 12 months of therapy, while patients of group B achieved a significant increase in their lumbar spine BMD (p=0.028), and a borderline increase in their femoral neck BMD. Zoledronic acid reduced bone pain in groups A+B, while there was no bone pain relief in placebo group after 12 months of therapy. Interestingly, after 36 months, patients of both groups A and B showed a dramatic increase in BMD of all studied sites compared with baseline values (p=0.001, p=0.001, and <0.001 for BMD of lumbar spine, femoral neck, and forearm, respectively). Patients of group C who received zoledronic acid for 12 months after the placebo period showed also a dramatic increase in BMD of all studied sites at 36 month (p=0.008, p=0.018, and <0.001 for BMD of lumbar spine, femoral neck, and forearm, respectively), while they also reduced significantly bone pain scores (p<0.001). At 36 month, there was no difference in terms of BMD of lumbar spine and forearm between patients of groups A and B, while BMD of the femoral neck continued to be higher in group B (either as a T-score absolute value or as a T-score percentage change; p=0.01). No skeletal related events were observed during the study period. This study suggests that zoledronic acid is an effective treatment in increasing BMD in TM-induced osteoporosis. Its effect seems to be continued even 24 months after the discontinuation of the drug. Studies with larger number of patients are required to clarify the best dose and treatment duration of zoledronic acid for the management of TM-induced osteoporosis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».