Primary Cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: The British Columbia Cancer Agency Experience
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PCALCL) is a rare T-cell cutaneous lymphoma consisting of CD30 positive typically anaplastic-appearing cells and was distinguished from systemic ALCL and lymphomatoid papulosis in the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Previous studies have shown PCALCL has an excellent overall survival with few patients dying from disease. Over-treatment should be avoided. Methods: The British Columbia Cancer Agency Lymphoid Cancer Database was searched to identify all adults (>18 years) diagnosed with PCALCL from 1993 to 2013 with complete clinical information. Pathologic records were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis and correlate with presenting clinical features. Before 2005, patients with limited stage disease commonly received combined modality therapy using CHOP-like chemotherapy. After 2005, the Lymphoma Tumor Group endorsed treatment with radiotherapy (RT) alone due to emerging data failing to support a role for chemotherapy. Results: 46 patients (31 males (67%); M:F ratio 2) with a median age of 64 y were identified (Table 1). 39 patients had limited stage disease (stage 1A, n=38; stage 2A n=1) and 7 patients had advanced stage disease (multiple distant cutaneous sites). For the limited stage patients 18 were treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone, 8 with combined modality therapy (CMT) consisting of CHOP-like chemotherapy for 3 cycles followed by involved field RT, 4 with chemotherapy alone, 5 with surgical resection alone and 4 patients refused or were too frail to be treated due to unrelated comorbidities. For the 7 patients with advanced stage disease, 2 received local therapy alone (RT n=2; surgery n=1) and 4 received CHOP-like chemotherapy. The median follow-up for living patients was 54.5 months (range 4 to 241 months). Overall, 18 (39%) patients relapsed, of which, only 2 (11%) had progressed to advanced stage at first relapse. The majority of relapses were cutaneous; however, 4 patients ultimately developed systemic disease with biopsy proven ALK-negative ALCL. 4 patients (9%) died from PCALCL and none had had advanced stage disease at diagnosis. For the whole cohort, the 5-y time to progression (TTP) was 53% (59% for limited stage and 21% for advanced stage patients), the 5-y disease specific survival (DSS) was 83% and the 5-y overall survival (OS) was 73%. In an as-treated analysis, the 5-y DSS for limited stage patients was similar comparing RT to CMT or CHOP-like chemotherapy alone (Figure 1) but the 5-y TTP for limited stage patients favored RT alone compared to CMT or CHOP-like chemotherapy (76% vs 33%, p=0.02)(Figure 2). Furthermore, limited stage patients treated after the 2005 policy change endorsing RT alone had a similar TTP compared to patients treated prior to 2005 (5-y TTP 61% vs 50%, respectively, p= 0.860). The 5-y DSS and OS rates for all patients with limited stage disease were 80% and 68%, respectively. For all patients, the five year risk of systemic recurrence was 9%. Conclusion: Limited stage is typical of PCALCL and few patients present with advanced disease. We confirm the favorable prognosis in PCALCL and the effectiveness of RT alone, without systemic treatment, at minimizing the risk of relapse. A small proportion of patients developed systemic ALCL. Stage at diagnosis did not predict the rare event of death in this series. Table 1. Patient characteristics and clinical follow-up Characteristic N (%) Total 46 (100%) Gender Males 31 (67%) Stage at diagnosis I/II 39 (85%) IV 7 (15%) Initial treatment Radiotherapy (RT) alone 20 (44%) CHOP-like + RT 8 (17%) CHOP-like 8 (17%) Surgery 6 (13%) Refused 1 (2%) Too frail 3 (7%) Response rate Complete 40 (87%) Partial 5 (11%) Uncertain 1 (2%) Site of first relapse Skin only 14 (78%) Regional lymph node 0 (0%) Systemic* 4 (22%) Follow-up (months) Median (range) 54.5 (4 to 241) Status at last follow-up No evidence of disease 28 (61%) Alive with disease 6 (13%) Died of lymphoma 4 (9%) Died of other cause 9 (19.5%) Disease-specific survival 5 y (all patients) (83%) Overall survival 5 y (all patients) (73%) Progression-free survival 5 y (all patients) (42%) * Two patients initially relapsing in the skin subsequently developed a systemic relapse. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».