Socioeconomic circumstances among school-aged children in Europe and North America
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Socioeconomic inequality and child well-being In today’s Europe, as well as in most other advanced countries, there is a rising proportion of people living in poverty and increasing socioeconomic inequality (Atkinson et al, 1995). This is the case, not only in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), but also in west European welfare states and other highly developed countries such as Canada, the United States and Australia. High economic growth, in conjunction with rising unemployment and low paid jobs, has led to widening income gaps. These in turn have resulted in changing living conditions for children – for example, at least one parent out of work and resultant material hardship. In addition, in Europe and North America there have been changes in family structure and circumstances with an increase in lone-parent families, divorces and commuter families. A narrowing labour market and fragile social and family support networks place a higher proportion of children at potential risk of reduced health and well-being. The transition countries of East Europe have experienced a dramatic change of social structure within the last decade. Starting from a comparatively equal distribution of standard of living and access to life chances in the former socialist societies, the 1990’s have seen a widening gap between poor and rich families (Notburga and Wagner, 1997; Offe, 1997; Columbus, 1998). These trends are likely to affect young people’s life chances and their mental and social well-being, because of the major links between developmental potentials and life chances. However, the impact of social inequality during childhood and adolescence, in terms of impairment to health and well-being rather than mortality or morbidity, has received limited attention in cross-national studies of young people. In their recent analysis, Micklewright and Stewart (1999) identified the need for more measurement of child well-being, in order to address this dearth of data. One cross-national study of young people in West and East Europe and in North America has attempted to measure childhood and adolescent socioeconomic circumstances and investigate their association with health and well-being. This is the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children: WHO Cross-National Study (HBSC) (Currie et al, 1998; Currie et al, 2000). A description of the study and its methodology is given in the Appendix.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle