CSF1R Is Associated with Poor Overall Survival in AML and Mediates Supportive Interactions Between AML and Stromal Cells in the AML Microenvironment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Bone marrow (BM) stromal cells produce factors important for the growth and maintenance of normal hematopoietic, as well as leukemic cells. Interactions between hematopoietic and stromal cells as mediated by classic ligand-receptor, cytokine and metabolic elements help to create a supportive microenvironmental niche. Colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) is a cytokine produced by BM stromal cells. CSF1 exists as both secreted and membrane-bound isoforms, with the latter being predominant in the BM. CSF1 acts on the CSF1 receptor (CSF1R), which is expressed on phagocytic cells to induce their growth and differentiation into monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) arises from mutations that lead to a block in differentiation of myeloid cell precursors (myeloblast or blast cells), the accumulation of which interferes with normal hematopoiesis. In this study, we examined the role of the CSF1-CSF1R interaction in AML as related to patient outcome and its influence on AML-stromal cell interactions. Analysis of cell surface protein levels of CSF1R by flow cytometry revealed that a subset of AML patient samples express high levels of CSF1R (CSF1Rhigh). Clinically, we found that CSF1Rhigh patients have shorter overall survival compared to patients with low CSF1R expression. To examine the CSF1-CSF1R interaction experimentally, CSF1Rhigh AML cells (patient samples and cell lines) were grown in in-vitro co-cultures with murine MS5 stromal cells engineered to overexpress the membrane-bound form of human CSF1 (MS5-hCSF1). We found that MS5-hCSF1 stromal cells display an increased growth rate, altered cytokine profile and signaling changes (namely mTOR pathway activation) compared to cells that do not express CSF1. In co-culture assays, we found that MS5-hCSF1 stromal cells enhanced the long-term growth (2 weeks) and survival of CSF1Rhigh AML cells by several fold. This growth advantage was not observed for CSF1RlowAML cells. Pre-culture of AML cells with MS5-hCSF1 stromal cells for 72 hours led to increased colony numbers in colony forming unit (CFU) assays compared to pre-culture on non-CSF1-expressing stroma. This suggests that exposure to CSF1 may enhance the clonogenic potential of AML cells. Co-culture of AML cells with MS5-hCSF1 stromal cells led to increased surface expression of the stem cell markers CD34 and CD117 (c-kit), suggestive of an immature, progenitor-like AML phenotype driven by CSF1. Furthermore, co-culture of AML and MS5-hCSF1 stromal cells led to distinct changes in the cytokine profiles of both AML and stromal cells, with increased levels of IL-8, IL-10 and IL-1 RA and RANTES in AML cells, and increased levels of IL-3, IL-6 and VEGF in stromal cells. Taken together, these results suggest that the CSF1-CSF1R interaction may be important in promoting a pro-leukemic phenotype. In particular, stromal support of AML is enhanced in a CSF1-dependent manner, with effects on AML growth, differentiation and production of signaling molecules. These effects in turn, have implications for modulating stromal cells themselves. Studying and understanding the complex interplays between AML and stromal cells as driven by the CSF1-CSF1R interaction may aid in the development of therapeutic approaches to target AML and its niche environment. Disclosures Jain: Roche Canada: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».