Trajectories of Inflammation Markers after Acute DVT and Their Association with the Postthrombotic Syndrome
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: The postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is the most common chronic complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Inflammation markers can predict PTS when measured at discrete time points after DVT; however, this approach does not recognize patterns of change over time. Objective: To describe change of inflammation marker levels after acute proximal DVT and assess the association of individual biomarker trajectories with risk of PTS. Methods: The BioSOX is a substudy of the SOX Trial. Patients with first, symptomatic, proximal DVT were followed for 24 months. The study end point, PTS, was diagnosed starting from 6 months post DVT using the Villalta scale. During the SOX trial we collected blood samples from participants at baseline, 1 and 6 months, and measured concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 using validated established methods. We used group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to identify biomarker level trajectories from the time of acute DVT up to six months post DVT and assign patients to trajectory groups. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used to investigate the association of clinical and demographic characteristics and trajectory group assignment. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) for PTS according to trajectory group. Models were adjusted for predefined covariates (age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and extent of DVT) and data driven confounders found to be significantly associated with trajectory group. Results: Of 703 patients, 327 developed PTS. Figure 1 depicts the best trajectory models for each of the 4 biomarkers. For both ICAM-1 and IL-10, the best model was a 3-group model with high, intermediate and low biomarker level trajectories. For both IL-6 and CRP, the best model was comprised of 4 groups, which consisted of the highest group (group 3) having a rapidly declining profile to an intermediate level by the first month after DVT, and a second high group (group 4) having levels that remained high for the entire sampling time. Clinical and demographic variables most closely associated with trajectory group assignment were age, BMI, infectious or inflammatory conditions in the month prior to DVT, smoking, cancer related DVT and anatomical extent of DVT. For ICAM-1 there was a significant association of trajectory group assignment and risk of PTS (Table 1). Adjusted RR for trajectory group 2 vs. group 3 was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.67 – 0.93). There were no associations of the other biomarker trajectory groups with PTS risk. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to use trajectory analyses to describe temporal patterns of change in inflammation marker levels after acute DVT and relate these to risk of PTS. Results suggest that patients demonstrate distinct patterns of change in biomarker levels over the first six months after acute DVT. Persistently high ICAM-1 levels in the first six months after DVT were associated with an increased risk of PTS. Verification of these results is needed by other studies. Figure 1. Group based trajectory models for biomarker trajectories after acute DVT. Figure 1. Group based trajectory models for biomarker trajectories after acute DVT. Table 1: Association between biomarker trajectory group and PTS Trajectory group* Crude RR (95% CI) Adjusted† RR (95%CI) ICAM-1 1 vs. 3 0.60 (0.33-1.10) 0.67 (0.36-1.24) 2 vs. 3 0.74 (0.63-0.87) 0.79 (0.67-0.93) IL-10 1 vs. 3 1.01 (0.60-2.02) 1.19 (0.66-2.16) 2 vs. 3 1.08 (0.79-1.46) 1.13 (0.83-1.53) CRP 1 vs. 4 0.80 (0.60-1.04) 0.95 (0.70-1.28) 2 vs. 4 0.91 (0.73-1.13) 1.00 (0.80-1.25) 3 vs. 4 0.79 (0.61-1.01) 0.89 (0.68-1.16) IL-6 1 vs. 4 0.84 (0.62-1.15) 1.01 (0.73-1.40) 2 vs. 4 1.01 (0.76-1.35) 1.02 (0.76-1.36) 3 vs. 4 0.90 (0.62-1.32) 0.96 (0.65-1.41) ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule1; IL-10, Interleukin 10; CRP, C-reactiveprotein; IL-6, Interleukin 6; RR, risk ratio. *See Figure 1 for graphical depiction of trajectory group patterns over time †Adjustment variables: ICAM-1: age, sex, BMI, extent of DVT, smoking status and type of DVT IL-6 and IL-10: age, sex, BMI, extent of DVT, infection or inflammatory condition in the month prior to DVT, smoking status and type of DVT CRP: age, sex, BMI, extent of DVT, infection or inflammatory condition in the month prior to DVT and type of DVT. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».