Next Generation Materials for Lithium-Ion Space Batteries
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
EaglePicher has been supplying batteries for energy storage for satellites and other space applications since 1958. These batteries have achieved over 2.6 billion hours of cell operations with no failures in orbit. Over the decades the battery chemistry has changed amongst various chemistries with some overlap and some still being used today. Typical space battery chemistries include: silver-zinc, nickel-hydrogen, nickel-cadmium, and then lithium-ion. Even within the lithium-ion chemistry the formulations and packaging has evolved over time and continues to change. Lithium-ion space batteries continue to evolve today. New satellites and space applications are demanding increased energy, more power, and smaller volumes. This has led to improvements in increased energy, wider operating temperatures, more power and smaller packages. Every change in battery performance requires new or modified battery materials. For increased energy the incumbent cathode material for lithium-ion batteries is Lithiated Nickel Cobalt Oxide (NCO). This was changed to the Lithiated Nickel Cobalt Aluminum Oxide to increase the energy and improve cycle life. For wider operating temperatures the electrolyte formulation has evolved with new components and additives. Newer and next generation satellites are carrying state of the art instruments that demand high power or pulses of power. New lithium-ion battery chemistries have been developed to supply very high power discharges to supply the large currents. As small satellites are increasing in popularity, there is a push for smaller battery packs. This has led to a decrease in cell capacity and the introduction of commercial of the shelf (COTS) cells. These are often cylindrical in shape and typically 18650 in size. Transitioning to COTS cells has increased the ability to create modular space batteries, but has brought up new concerns on quality and reliability. Quality and reliability, plus safety, are top concerns for space batteries. Replacement of batteries in space is extremely difficult and expensive. As each of the next generation battery materials are developed, reliability and safety much be eminent. These materials and batteries are often expected to supply power for decades. The continued testing, evaluation and analysis of the new chemistries and designs provides assurances for long-term performance and reliability. As these batteries have the potential to power satellites, landers, rovers, capsules, and habitats, EaglePicher continues to develop, evolve, demonstrate, and produce new battery chemistries and designs to meet the mission requirements. Acknowledgements We would like to thank: NASA JPL, Lockheed Martin and the Unites States Government for supporting some of this effort, and many of the EaglePicher employees who worked on these projects.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,032 | 0,020 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».