Who I am is Shaped by my Past and Impacts my Future: Exploring Antecedents and Outcomes of Self-Views across International, Immigrant, and Canadian born Undergraduate Students
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation focused on how various self-views variables (self-esteem, self-concept, and self-concept clarity) differ across and within groups of university students, are influenced by internal and external factors, and predict academic and non-academic variables. Key models of self and group perceptions were used in deriving hypotheses (i.e., Shavelson, Hubner & Stanton, 1976; Bosson & Swann Jr, 2009; Stephan, Ybarra, & Morrison, 2009). Across the four studies, self-report questionnaires were used. Studies 1 and 4 were completed online by international, immigrant, and Canadian born students. Studies 2 and 3 examined only international students, involved an experimental manipulation, and were conducted in-lab. The aim of Study 1 was to ascertain if self-concept scores differ across international, immigrant, and Canadian born students. Immigrant students had higher math self-concept than Canadian-born students, and international students had lower verbal and academic self-concept than non-international students. Study 2 was designed to explore whether self-concepts (general, academic, and verbal) and self-esteem levels of international students would be affected when primed with threat, and to see whether resilience and acculturative stress would moderate the threat-self-views link. Scores did not differ across conditions and moderations were non-significant.\nIn Study 3, the hypotheses in Study 2 were reexamined with a different experimental manipulation. Other differences between these studies were the inclusion of a positive non-threat priming condition and measures of self-concept clarity and religion self-concept. Self-views scores did not differ across priming conditions. However, with increasing levels of acculturative stress, the drop in general self-concept was smaller for those in the positive non-threat condition than in the neutral condition. Study 4 assessed whether there were group differences in the prediction of outcomes by self-views variables. Results indicated that self-views predict outcomes in expected ways (e.g., academic self-concept predicts GPA), but that there are group differences in prediction (e.g., immigrant students reported lower levels of life satisfaction compared to Canadian born students as levels of general self-concept increased). In sum, international, immigrant, and Canadian born students differ across self-concept domains and in predictor-criterion relationships, and the self-perceptions of international students change depending on context. Implications for educational stakeholders and self-views researchers are outlined.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».