TRAIL/ DR5 Interactions Are Important for Thymic Damage After Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 234 Thymic GVHD (tGVHD) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT) is associated with prolonged immunodeficiency. We have previously shown that thymic output after allo-BMT is directly related to thymus size, and inversely related to donor T cell dose and GVHD severity. Additionally, radiation-containing preparative regimens upregulate the death receptors Fas and DR5 on thymic stroma (especially epithelium) while decreasing expression of the anti-apoptotic protein cFLIP, thereby sensitizing the thymus to GVHD. Moreover, small numbers of donor alloreactive T cells are sufficient to cause tGVHD, and they utilize the Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) and TRAIL/DR5 pathways to mediate damage thymic stroma, architecture and function. We performed experiments in both MHC-mismatched and MHC-matched minor antigen-disparate model systems, and demonstrated the exquisite sensitivity of the thymus to as few as 1–2.5×105 donor T cells, which mediated tGVHD without evidence of overt clinical disease or significant weight loss. Additionally, tGVHD is partially reversible in our model systems (contingent on a low T cell dose), such that mice with tGVHD exhibit a transient but partially reversible decrease in thymic cellularity when measured at days 28 vs. 60 post-transplant (Figure 1). To further study the role of TRAIL in tGVHD, we asked whether (1) alloreactive T cells and (2) the inflammation associated with conditioning and acute GVHD, were strictly required for TRAIL/DR5-mediated thymic damage. We treated recipients of T cell-depleted allo-BMT with the amDR5-1 agonistic antibody (0.2 mg i.p. per dose) either in the ‘early‘ peri-transplant period, or ‘late,‘ in the second week post-transplant. Allo-BMT recipients treated ‘early‘ with amDR5-1 had significantly decreased thymic cellularity and splenic BM-derived T cells as compared with controls. Furthermore, we observed similar BM cellularity and BM-derived lineage− sca-1+ckit+ (LSK), all in the absence of donor alloreactive T cells and GVHD (Figure 2). We observed similar results with mice treated ‘late‘ amDR5-1 using the later schedule, which indicates that the thymus has continued sensitivity to TRAIL throughout the post-transplant period, and that GVHD and/or conditioning-associated cytokines are not required to enable TRAIL-mediated damage to the thymus. We further assessed the expression of DR5 on donor BM-derived thymocytes to determine whether amDR5-1 acted directly on thymocytes. We observed that on day 28 after T cell-depleted allo-BMT, only 1-2% of donor thymocytes expressed DR5, suggesting that amDR5-1 (and potentially TRAIL) mediate their effects on thymic cellularity and function primarily via an indirect mechanism (Figure 3). These data suggest to us that significant damage to the thymus and thymopoiesis during allo-BMT: Together, our data in clinically-relevant mouse allo-BMT models suggests that the thymus is highly sensitive to GVHD and endures severe damage at relatively low levels of systemic GVHD. Moreover, post-transplant thymic atrophy is a partially-reversible process which depends on the T cell dose, and which occurs via the TRAIL pathway. Finally, we provide significant mechanistic insight which shows that TRAIL-mediated thymic damage can occur (1) throughout the early post-transplant period, and (2) does not strictly require alloreactive T cells, or the inflammatory processes associated with conditioning and GVHD. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».